A Mastodon post of someone complaining about the inaccessibility of research papers
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 119 points 2 months ago (20 children)

My mate Anna has a great archive of papers. Look her up some time!

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    are the papers from annas archive redundant with scihub, or are they from a different source?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Papers in Anna's archive are mostly from sci-hub. There's something not available on sci-hub, but not much.

    Real problem is that sci-hub was the organization doing the archival on large scale and it is now dead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Not exactly dead, but on a stale due to a legal dispute. However, they have started a new project that fits a legal grey-area called sci-net where people can ask for or help others get access to papers by getting them from their institutional login and sharing on the platform. Not as practical as sci-hub, but better than nothing and less prone to be taken down

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -42 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (13 children)

    I'm no scientist but I imagine if you want to cite someone, you need to access their research legally

    Holy fuck you people are insufferable. 20 down and flooding my inbox for that? What the fuck lmao

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago

    Not really, you need to know (enough of) the content of what you're citing to make sure that the citation makes sense. The actual info you need to write down for the citation is easily available. How you accessed it is irrelevant.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago

    Ooh, this is actually a more controversial take among academics than you can imagine!

    Around week 3 of my course I ask the question "what percentage cut do academics get for published articles". They are always appalled to learn it is 0% (we get nothing, we are literally paid in exposure).

    Below are some other issues with the journal industry as a whole:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serials_crisis?wprov=sfla1

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_journal_publishing_reform?wprov=sfla1

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elsevier#Criticism_and_controversies%3Fwprov=sfla1

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cost_of_Knowledge?wprov=sfla1

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago*

    I read the source of my citations, but nowhere am I required to cite the citations of my source. If you don't wanna "try" to access my resources... well, that sounds like a "you thing". Good luck, cause my paper remains

    Paywalling knowledge is the same as bypassing it

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    Happens often to me. I know nobody in research who would care about it. Most people will likely congratulate you for not paying for access. Nobody likes the way journals do business.

    Fuck you Elsevier.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    20 down

    Have another one! Knowledge (and doing research) should be free and not only for people who can pay for it. Look up how ridiculously expensive and complicated it is to access those publications.

  • source
  • parent