did you read the fuckin article? lol

Yes, an unscientific puff piece about green washing being presented as a good thing despite it doing nothing of value. It's the same thing as Target making a press release about rainbow children's onesies or when the US government super duper promises to replant some of the trees they blow up.

you need to change your name yo, what youre talking about is heirarchy. That humans are better than everything else, and anything else soley exsist to serve humans.

Read On Authority by Engels sometime. Not only is the point of Marxism not the elimination of all Hierarchy, communism is in fact impossible without some hierarchies.

Yes, everything exists to serve humans. This also means humans have the responsibility to continue the things that keep us alive. Saying 'oh woo woo says we're all equal and one' takes all responsibility off of humanity. The same as this nonsense:

Without humans, the trees and animals would still be here.

Maybe, we can't know that and it would be a pointless existence for them at that point. They exist so that we can exist, so we can keep them existing so we can continue to exist. The opposite is not true.

Trees cannot take care of us. They are not the solution to climate change. They don't sequester anywhere enough carbon for the amount we're releasing. They're too inefficient. And we've done too much damage. By showing we are able to end all life on Earth we show that not only is everything dependent on us, we have the sole responsibility of their survival as well.

That's not how life works. Every single form of life requires the destruction of other life, until we get down to individual amino acid chains which are very arguably not life the same way a fetus is not life.

How wolves change rivers!

You're not capable of making that determination based on your post history.

You objectively do not know what either of those words mean.