▲ 44 ▼ Why it is that in the USA for most people the default color for a casual sock is white but in most other places the default is black? (fedinsfw.app) submitted 1 month ago by Hirohito@fedinsfw.app to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world 37 comments fedilink hide all child comments Not counting specific fashion trends or saying this applies to 100% of people. but why are those the default for the majority?
[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago* (1 child) The OP specified casual wear and you're telling them they're wrong because of how people dress up? For general casual wear, white socks are pretty normal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago* (1 child) You are mistaken: Read what I wrote again (or not I guess, not super important lol). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) I just did. Mind clarifying? I would challenge your assumption Indicates you think OP is wrong White socks are not the norm in the US A characterization that does not match my experience as an American especially when you're wearing something with visible socks Not relevant to my comment, but still not true in my American experience or are dressing up Completely irrelevant to the OP talking about casual wear. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago* (1 child) Yeah actually I'm done arguing with a stranger about socks. White socks being the norm hasn't been my experience. If that upsets you, I guess you're going to have to find some way to come to terms with that. Sorry. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) I don't care about the socks. I was just pointing out that you based your disagreement at least in part on dressing up when OP said casual wear. And then for some reason I can't understand you doubled down on it and told me I was wrong about the words you wrote that are still right there. So I broke down my understanding of your very straightforward sentence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) You seem to be pretty focused on this so I would again invite you to re-read what I wrote if you care that much. If it still confuses you, try reading it again because I'm fresh out of additional shits to give today. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) Lmfao, nah. You know you were wrong and seem to think you can just say "read it again" rather than explain yourself. I already explained how what you said was irrelevant, it's your turn. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago* You'll have to find someone else to argue about socks with. Goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago* (1 child) You are mistaken: Read what I wrote again (or not I guess, not super important lol). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) I just did. Mind clarifying? I would challenge your assumption Indicates you think OP is wrong White socks are not the norm in the US A characterization that does not match my experience as an American especially when you're wearing something with visible socks Not relevant to my comment, but still not true in my American experience or are dressing up Completely irrelevant to the OP talking about casual wear. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago* (1 child) Yeah actually I'm done arguing with a stranger about socks. White socks being the norm hasn't been my experience. If that upsets you, I guess you're going to have to find some way to come to terms with that. Sorry. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) I don't care about the socks. I was just pointing out that you based your disagreement at least in part on dressing up when OP said casual wear. And then for some reason I can't understand you doubled down on it and told me I was wrong about the words you wrote that are still right there. So I broke down my understanding of your very straightforward sentence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) You seem to be pretty focused on this so I would again invite you to re-read what I wrote if you care that much. If it still confuses you, try reading it again because I'm fresh out of additional shits to give today. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) Lmfao, nah. You know you were wrong and seem to think you can just say "read it again" rather than explain yourself. I already explained how what you said was irrelevant, it's your turn. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago* You'll have to find someone else to argue about socks with. Goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) I just did. Mind clarifying? I would challenge your assumption Indicates you think OP is wrong White socks are not the norm in the US A characterization that does not match my experience as an American especially when you're wearing something with visible socks Not relevant to my comment, but still not true in my American experience or are dressing up Completely irrelevant to the OP talking about casual wear. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago* (1 child) Yeah actually I'm done arguing with a stranger about socks. White socks being the norm hasn't been my experience. If that upsets you, I guess you're going to have to find some way to come to terms with that. Sorry. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) I don't care about the socks. I was just pointing out that you based your disagreement at least in part on dressing up when OP said casual wear. And then for some reason I can't understand you doubled down on it and told me I was wrong about the words you wrote that are still right there. So I broke down my understanding of your very straightforward sentence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) You seem to be pretty focused on this so I would again invite you to re-read what I wrote if you care that much. If it still confuses you, try reading it again because I'm fresh out of additional shits to give today. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) Lmfao, nah. You know you were wrong and seem to think you can just say "read it again" rather than explain yourself. I already explained how what you said was irrelevant, it's your turn. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago* You'll have to find someone else to argue about socks with. Goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago* (1 child) Yeah actually I'm done arguing with a stranger about socks. White socks being the norm hasn't been my experience. If that upsets you, I guess you're going to have to find some way to come to terms with that. Sorry. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) I don't care about the socks. I was just pointing out that you based your disagreement at least in part on dressing up when OP said casual wear. And then for some reason I can't understand you doubled down on it and told me I was wrong about the words you wrote that are still right there. So I broke down my understanding of your very straightforward sentence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) You seem to be pretty focused on this so I would again invite you to re-read what I wrote if you care that much. If it still confuses you, try reading it again because I'm fresh out of additional shits to give today. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) Lmfao, nah. You know you were wrong and seem to think you can just say "read it again" rather than explain yourself. I already explained how what you said was irrelevant, it's your turn. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago* You'll have to find someone else to argue about socks with. Goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) I don't care about the socks. I was just pointing out that you based your disagreement at least in part on dressing up when OP said casual wear. And then for some reason I can't understand you doubled down on it and told me I was wrong about the words you wrote that are still right there. So I broke down my understanding of your very straightforward sentence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) You seem to be pretty focused on this so I would again invite you to re-read what I wrote if you care that much. If it still confuses you, try reading it again because I'm fresh out of additional shits to give today. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) Lmfao, nah. You know you were wrong and seem to think you can just say "read it again" rather than explain yourself. I already explained how what you said was irrelevant, it's your turn. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago* You'll have to find someone else to argue about socks with. Goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) You seem to be pretty focused on this so I would again invite you to re-read what I wrote if you care that much. If it still confuses you, try reading it again because I'm fresh out of additional shits to give today. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) Lmfao, nah. You know you were wrong and seem to think you can just say "read it again" rather than explain yourself. I already explained how what you said was irrelevant, it's your turn. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago* You'll have to find someone else to argue about socks with. Goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) Lmfao, nah. You know you were wrong and seem to think you can just say "read it again" rather than explain yourself. I already explained how what you said was irrelevant, it's your turn. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago* You'll have to find someone else to argue about socks with. Goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago* You'll have to find someone else to argue about socks with. Goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent