▲ 418 ▼ .... Fair (thelemmy.club) submitted 2 months ago by Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/funny@sh.itjust.works 117 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (23 children) People always say math when they just mean arithmetic. permalink fedilink source hideshow 23 child comments replies: [–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago (2 children) I say maths permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago I say arithmetics permalink fedilink source parent [–] Noam_Calhoun@lemmy.today 1 point 2 months ago Found the Brit. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jagungal@aussie.zone 6 points 2 months ago (14 children) For the general public that's a distinction without a difference permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 3 points 2 months ago Isn't arithmetic just a subset of math? So they're using a more generic descriptor. It's also better for brevity. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago* Sadly yes permalink fedilink source parent [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (11 children) Yeah but for those of us who actually studied math, it's silly. Rote arithmetic barely qualifies, you hardly even see actual numbers in math except for a handful of single digit integers for exponents, subscripts, coefficients, etc. It's like calling a golf cart a "sports car". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (2 children) how many people in the general population have mathematics degrees? 1.3 of undergrad degrees are in mathematics, and only about 40% of USA adults have a bachelors or higher, so about .053% of Americans have math degrees, or we can say 99.47% do not. so out of 2000 people, only 1 of them has a math degree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago This guy arithmetics! permalink fedilink source parent [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago The number of people who drive sports cars is also quite small, but that wouldn't make it less silly for the general population to use the term "sports car" exclusively to refer to golf carts. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (3 children) Imagine being the guy who gatekeeps maths. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) I'm not sure you understand my point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) No, I understand it, but you're still the guy who's gatekeeping maths, and your analogy is bad. A better one would be calling mixing vinegar and baking soda chemistry, which despite how basic (and acidic) it is any chemist will. Basic maths is still maths. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago Basic maths is still maths. Then you certainly misunderstood my point, because that wasn't it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jagungal@aussie.zone 1 point 2 months ago (3 children) Except that arithmetic still qualifies as maths even if it is only barely, whereas a golf cart doesn't qualify as a sports car. It's more like saying "vehicle" when you mean "kid's bicycle "; it's still technically true even though it isn't the most sophisticated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) It's a car you use for sports. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jagungal@aussie.zone 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Ok, good point. So what are you trying to say? That the general public should use the more specific word for the benefit of mathematicians? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago My only point is that it's silly to mathematicians that the majority of people use the word "math(s)" to refer exclusively to arithmetic. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sundray@lemmus.org 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) Perhaps they expected the server to use geometry to come up with the answer... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] save_the_humans@leminal.space 1 point 2 months ago* Here we use the metric, d(x, y) = |x - y|, to calculate the distance between points x, y in Q. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago Agreed. Most people don't realize arithmetic is actually a form of geography, and not math. True story. permalink fedilink source parent [–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 2 months ago As long as we aren't talking about maths, then I'm good permalink fedilink source parent [+] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 1 point 2 months ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago (2 children) I say maths permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago I say arithmetics permalink fedilink source parent [–] Noam_Calhoun@lemmy.today 1 point 2 months ago Found the Brit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago I say arithmetics permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jagungal@aussie.zone 6 points 2 months ago (14 children) For the general public that's a distinction without a difference permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 3 points 2 months ago Isn't arithmetic just a subset of math? So they're using a more generic descriptor. It's also better for brevity. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago* Sadly yes permalink fedilink source parent [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (11 children) Yeah but for those of us who actually studied math, it's silly. Rote arithmetic barely qualifies, you hardly even see actual numbers in math except for a handful of single digit integers for exponents, subscripts, coefficients, etc. It's like calling a golf cart a "sports car". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (2 children) how many people in the general population have mathematics degrees? 1.3 of undergrad degrees are in mathematics, and only about 40% of USA adults have a bachelors or higher, so about .053% of Americans have math degrees, or we can say 99.47% do not. so out of 2000 people, only 1 of them has a math degree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago This guy arithmetics! permalink fedilink source parent [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago The number of people who drive sports cars is also quite small, but that wouldn't make it less silly for the general population to use the term "sports car" exclusively to refer to golf carts. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (3 children) Imagine being the guy who gatekeeps maths. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) I'm not sure you understand my point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) No, I understand it, but you're still the guy who's gatekeeping maths, and your analogy is bad. A better one would be calling mixing vinegar and baking soda chemistry, which despite how basic (and acidic) it is any chemist will. Basic maths is still maths. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago Basic maths is still maths. Then you certainly misunderstood my point, because that wasn't it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jagungal@aussie.zone 1 point 2 months ago (3 children) Except that arithmetic still qualifies as maths even if it is only barely, whereas a golf cart doesn't qualify as a sports car. It's more like saying "vehicle" when you mean "kid's bicycle "; it's still technically true even though it isn't the most sophisticated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) It's a car you use for sports. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jagungal@aussie.zone 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Ok, good point. So what are you trying to say? That the general public should use the more specific word for the benefit of mathematicians? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago My only point is that it's silly to mathematicians that the majority of people use the word "math(s)" to refer exclusively to arithmetic. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 3 points 2 months ago Isn't arithmetic just a subset of math? So they're using a more generic descriptor. It's also better for brevity. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (11 children) Yeah but for those of us who actually studied math, it's silly. Rote arithmetic barely qualifies, you hardly even see actual numbers in math except for a handful of single digit integers for exponents, subscripts, coefficients, etc. It's like calling a golf cart a "sports car". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (2 children) how many people in the general population have mathematics degrees? 1.3 of undergrad degrees are in mathematics, and only about 40% of USA adults have a bachelors or higher, so about .053% of Americans have math degrees, or we can say 99.47% do not. so out of 2000 people, only 1 of them has a math degree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago This guy arithmetics! permalink fedilink source parent [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago The number of people who drive sports cars is also quite small, but that wouldn't make it less silly for the general population to use the term "sports car" exclusively to refer to golf carts. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (3 children) Imagine being the guy who gatekeeps maths. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) I'm not sure you understand my point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) No, I understand it, but you're still the guy who's gatekeeping maths, and your analogy is bad. A better one would be calling mixing vinegar and baking soda chemistry, which despite how basic (and acidic) it is any chemist will. Basic maths is still maths. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago Basic maths is still maths. Then you certainly misunderstood my point, because that wasn't it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jagungal@aussie.zone 1 point 2 months ago (3 children) Except that arithmetic still qualifies as maths even if it is only barely, whereas a golf cart doesn't qualify as a sports car. It's more like saying "vehicle" when you mean "kid's bicycle "; it's still technically true even though it isn't the most sophisticated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) It's a car you use for sports. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jagungal@aussie.zone 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Ok, good point. So what are you trying to say? That the general public should use the more specific word for the benefit of mathematicians? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago My only point is that it's silly to mathematicians that the majority of people use the word "math(s)" to refer exclusively to arithmetic. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (2 children) how many people in the general population have mathematics degrees? 1.3 of undergrad degrees are in mathematics, and only about 40% of USA adults have a bachelors or higher, so about .053% of Americans have math degrees, or we can say 99.47% do not. so out of 2000 people, only 1 of them has a math degree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago This guy arithmetics! permalink fedilink source parent [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago The number of people who drive sports cars is also quite small, but that wouldn't make it less silly for the general population to use the term "sports car" exclusively to refer to golf carts. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago This guy arithmetics! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago The number of people who drive sports cars is also quite small, but that wouldn't make it less silly for the general population to use the term "sports car" exclusively to refer to golf carts. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (3 children) Imagine being the guy who gatekeeps maths. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) I'm not sure you understand my point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) No, I understand it, but you're still the guy who's gatekeeping maths, and your analogy is bad. A better one would be calling mixing vinegar and baking soda chemistry, which despite how basic (and acidic) it is any chemist will. Basic maths is still maths. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago Basic maths is still maths. Then you certainly misunderstood my point, because that wasn't it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) I'm not sure you understand my point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) No, I understand it, but you're still the guy who's gatekeeping maths, and your analogy is bad. A better one would be calling mixing vinegar and baking soda chemistry, which despite how basic (and acidic) it is any chemist will. Basic maths is still maths. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago Basic maths is still maths. Then you certainly misunderstood my point, because that wasn't it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) No, I understand it, but you're still the guy who's gatekeeping maths, and your analogy is bad. A better one would be calling mixing vinegar and baking soda chemistry, which despite how basic (and acidic) it is any chemist will. Basic maths is still maths. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago Basic maths is still maths. Then you certainly misunderstood my point, because that wasn't it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago Basic maths is still maths. Then you certainly misunderstood my point, because that wasn't it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jagungal@aussie.zone 1 point 2 months ago (3 children) Except that arithmetic still qualifies as maths even if it is only barely, whereas a golf cart doesn't qualify as a sports car. It's more like saying "vehicle" when you mean "kid's bicycle "; it's still technically true even though it isn't the most sophisticated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) It's a car you use for sports. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jagungal@aussie.zone 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Ok, good point. So what are you trying to say? That the general public should use the more specific word for the benefit of mathematicians? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago My only point is that it's silly to mathematicians that the majority of people use the word "math(s)" to refer exclusively to arithmetic. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) It's a car you use for sports. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jagungal@aussie.zone 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Ok, good point. So what are you trying to say? That the general public should use the more specific word for the benefit of mathematicians? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago My only point is that it's silly to mathematicians that the majority of people use the word "math(s)" to refer exclusively to arithmetic. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jagungal@aussie.zone 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) Ok, good point. So what are you trying to say? That the general public should use the more specific word for the benefit of mathematicians? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago My only point is that it's silly to mathematicians that the majority of people use the word "math(s)" to refer exclusively to arithmetic. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago My only point is that it's silly to mathematicians that the majority of people use the word "math(s)" to refer exclusively to arithmetic. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sundray@lemmus.org 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) Perhaps they expected the server to use geometry to come up with the answer... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] save_the_humans@leminal.space 1 point 2 months ago* Here we use the metric, d(x, y) = |x - y|, to calculate the distance between points x, y in Q. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] save_the_humans@leminal.space 1 point 2 months ago* Here we use the metric, d(x, y) = |x - y|, to calculate the distance between points x, y in Q. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago Agreed. Most people don't realize arithmetic is actually a form of geography, and not math. True story. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 2 months ago As long as we aren't talking about maths, then I'm good permalink fedilink source parent