cross-posted from: https://piefed.social/c/electricvehicles/p/2162853/usa-slate-s-new-electric-truck-will-cost-slightly-more-than-24950

Range is said to be 205 mi (330 km), higher than the original estimate. This price is for the basic truck. The SUV configuration is expected to be $5000 more.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 59 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (24 children)

Slate raised at least $111 million in Series A financing, including an undisclosed amount from Bezos. Slate then raised $600 million in 2024 from Mark Walter, the controlling owner of the Los Angeles Dodgers and CEO of Guggenheim Partners, Jeff Bezos, and General Catalyst, a venture capital firm.[5] In mid-2026, the company said it had completed a $650m series C investment round, which took its total capital raised to $1.4bn.[6]

source

Bezos was seed money AND part of the owner conglomerate that raised all the capital the company started with in 2024. That is enough for me to avoid this like the plague as it will, certain as the sun is hot, be enshitified to the core

If you do not believe me, here is an article explaining how this is all a big Amazon initiative

https://techcrunch.com/2025/04/08/inside-the-ev-startup-secretly-backed-by-jeff-bezos/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (23 children)

    I would truly not be surprised that this would be an attempt to take over there ev truck market, but manufacturers should have been paying attention. There's a huge market for small ass trucks, no one is catering to it

    While I'm sure they'll try to enshittify, the downside to that plan is that they need to make sure no one takes their place and they need to have something people want that they can enshittify. The benefit of simplicity is that it makes it simpler for another manufacturer to pick up the slack.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    I drove a small truck at one point. Think a late 90s Tacoma, Ranger, or something like that. I don't want an F250. I don't want a Ram 3500. I just want to be able to haul a bed full of bikes to the MTB trail and help my friends move a washing machine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 16 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Slate has a size comparison widget on their website. You can show it with the silhouette of a current full size pickup and a circa 1985 small pickup. It's almost exactly the same size as that generation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    There’s a huge market for small ass trucks, no one is catering to it

    Absolutely correct. The American car makers keep on saying "we only want big trucks" but that is complete BS, there is plenty of demand for smaller trucks which is why they have lobbied the gov to all but ban any possible import

    The benefit of simplicity is that it makes it simpler for another manufacturer to pick up the slack.

    While this is true in theory, in practice it rarely shows up. If these trucks do deliver a good, simple experience at $25K, others would not be able to just copy it and catch up. It would be easier for any of the big guys to just buy the company.

    If the company is not for sale, then they would have the monopoly on small trucks and thus, freedom to enshitify

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    While this is true in theory, in practice it rarely shows up. If these trucks do deliver a good, simple experience at $25K, others would not be able to just copy it and catch up. It would be easier for any of the big guys to just buy the company.

    I agree, but without the complications of a combustion engine, it makes it a lot easier. You can buy ev conversion kits for around $15k, so there's also an "I'll make my own, with blackjack, and hookers" option.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    There's a huge market for small ass trucks, no one is catering to it

    Ford is. The Maverick is selling like hotcakes (not the 60s coupe). And they have an electric small truck coming soon as well. There's also Tello.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    There's a huge market for small ass trucks, no one is catering to it

    That's incorrect. The Ford Maverick and Hyundai Santa Cruz exist and are very popular.

    Toyota is about to release one to compete with the Maverick, and Dodge has a small and a mid sized truck in the works.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

    Those are midsized. I would say Hyundai is the only one with the Santa Cruz, and that's not really a truck.

    Edit: I stand corrected, I had assumed the maverick was rwd/awd, not fwd/awd. I'm going to amend my statement and say the maverick is also not really a truck. I consider having the drive wheels under the payload to be an important aspect of a truck. Not that it really matters in the grand scheme of things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    The Ford Maverick and Hyundai Santa Cruz

    Neither are small.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    I'm guessing you've never seen them next to a regular pickup. They're 20-40in shorter in length than a Ram 1500 (depending on cab configuration).

    My Santa Cruz is shorter than their engine compartment. When I park between two regular trucks mine looks like a hotwheels truck.

    Shit, it's even smaller than a Toyota Helix.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (4 children)

    That’s incorrect. The Ford Maverick and Hyundai Santa Cruz exist and are very popular.

    And they are still inefficient monsters compared to what a real small truck should be:

    Ford Maverick (2022+):

    • Length: Approx. 199.7 inches (5.07 meters) almost 1.7 meters larger, 6 feet or so

    • Width: Approx. 72.6 inches (1.84 meters)

    • Height: Approx. 68.7 inches (1.75 meters)

    • Bed Length: 4.5 feet (approx. 54 inches / 1.37 meters) 45% LESS cargo space than a kei truck

    Typical Kei Truck (e.g., Suzuki Carry):

    • Length: Max legal limit is 3.4 meters (133.9 inches / 11.15 feet).

    • Width: Max legal limit is 1.48 meters (58.3 inches). Often around 1.4 meters.

    • Height: Varies, but typically around 1.9–2.0 meters (75–79 inches) including the cab/bed height, though the cargo bed side walls are very low (often ~1 meter total height from ground).

    • Bed Length: Typically around 2.0 meters (78 inches / 6.5 feet), which is actually longer than the Maverick's bed in some configurations relative to the vehicle length, though the total footprint is much smaller.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    You gotta add a normal US truck to your stats.

    The Santa Cruz and Maverick are 2-3.5ft shorter than a Ram 1500.

    I have a Santa Cruz, and it looks like a toy truck next to the normal ones. Especially next to duallies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    oh yes most others are way bigger… but I was comparing the "small" trucks that are actually available in the USA to make the point they are not in the same level the real small trucks are

  • source
  • parent