you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Pretty sure thats actually illegal in the US because you are legally obligated to do what makes the board and investors the most money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    The need to act in the best interest of the shareholders, if they are making less immediate profits to make more gains long term they can easily make that argument. Convincing the board not to replace you and hire someone that will ride the bubble til it pops is a different story.

  • source
  • parent