248
submitted 13 hours ago by ramble81@lemmy.zip to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 hours ago

I think the real threat of AI is not that it's getting smarter, but that it's demonstrably making us dumber. Who is going to be creating the training data of the future?

[-] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

I think you just answered your own question. In the scenario of ASI, who is training an AI smarter than an AI that's already smarter than us? Also I don't suspect AI will continue to be as inefficient as it is today in training or inference. A good example are voice clones that went from needing hours of audio to just 30 seconds of training data. On top of that synthetic data has been more than useful, aka data created by an AI to train another. One of my earliest projects was for a client who couldn't give us any data to work on but gave us a breakdown of what the data was like so we just lorem ipsumed our way there to a model that could actually find their false negatives and false positives in their testing.

this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
248 points (97.0% liked)

Fuck AI

7427 readers
684 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS