PC Gaming

pcgaming@lemmy.ca

15,630 readers

4,853 active

460 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago

moderators

EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca

UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca

KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Data analyst finds 'AI stigma' on Steam can reduce the number of reviews a game gets by around 53%—and the reviews it does get are more negative (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 3 months ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca

94 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

People who really care about it are still going to be exposed to games that contain "undeclared" AI assets.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yes. Just because some break rules does not mean we should have no rules. I mean obviously there will be some who hide this fact and hope nobody notices it, this is without saying. So I don't understand why you specifically bring this up.

Edit: Let me make an example. Some games or applications may collect your data. What we are asking is, please tell us, force them to tell us. There might be some who don't tell us and collect data without we ever noticing. So that would be those people similar to "undeclared" Ai assets.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent