you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 78 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Here's the Pew article instead of the journalistic swill Futurism publishes.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    This is so much more informative than that article, and as a bonus the site is actually usable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    Pretty much any time a news article cites public opinion it's better to go to the primary sources or become very skeptical if they don't provide a link to the survey data. It's just a different purpose to convey the info without the sensationalism and manufactured perspective.

    I started reading an article yesterday on a prominent international news source via rss about American opinions on the war and negotiations with Iran talking about majority public opinion as fact. I scanned through the rest of the article and there was no actual data, and only at the end did it state it was an op-ed written by a lobbyist and strategic advocacy employee. The web page had opinion written on the top but the feed just had it at the bottom.

  • source
  • parent