204
Something true
(thelemmy.club)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
204 points (100.0% liked)
ShermanPosting
354 readers
231 users here now
Where we meme (joking in tone and detail, serious in sentiment) about General Sherman, the Civil War, and how the secesh traitors had it coming.
RULES
-
No bigotry. The Union, or at least the part of the Union WE support, fought AGAINST that shite. We are anti-racist, anti-sexist, anti-homophobic, anti-transphobic, and in general anti-bigot here, even if not all the lads in Union blue uniforms were.
-
No Confederate sympathizing. Anti-democratic racist slaver traitors don't deserve shit.
-
Follow all Piefed.social rules
OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:
- !historymemes@piefed.social
- !historyart@piefed.social
- !historyartifacts@piefed.social
- !historyphotos@piefed.social
- !askhistorians@piefed.social
founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
The north rejecting the souths comprimises is in no way proof that it was only about slavery. Its proof the north wanted to keep control, nothing more. There were no comprimies. None. Not on the souths attempts at industrialazation and none on the self serviing tarrifs. The fact the battle cry was slavery was a easy sell to the northern whites. Kinda like round of all the browns and throw them out is today. The very fact that you think the corruption of post war america was somehow separate from the repulicans of the time is silly.
Finally how is SCOTUS striking down anti segragation laws in any way conflict with jim crow? The north had what they wanted and were apathetic to the fate of the former slaves.
"Keep control"
... this the same USA which was dominated by Southern politics all the way up to 1860.
What attempts at industrialization.
Fucking what.
"Northern white folk were invested in the Civil War because of the call to anti-slavery action, but the North also didn't care about slavery"
Are you being fucking serious right now.
Jesus fucking Christ, I'd give you a lesson on the context of 1876 election if everything you've said up to this point wasn't reflective of a frightening level of motivated ignorance.
"The North didn't give two shits about Jim Crow!"
"The North literally passed Federal laws against segregation. They were struck down by the Supreme Court."
"How do anti-segregation laws in any way conflict with Jim Crow????"
Are you fucking stupid.
I'm just gonna answer the last one. No I'm not fucking stupid and I've read more civil war history than you have. You are pretty typical for someone who says they read about history. You pick and choose to match your opinion. Nothing more. You claim to know the history but claim don't know about how tariffs of the time were geared toward northern interest. You claim you don't know about the souths attempts to industrialize. You don't know much or you do and choose to ignore it. I'm done. Cause I don't have to ask if you are fucking stupid.