▲ 1042 ▼ Growth (thelemmy.club) submitted 2 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 186 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 38 points 2 months ago (33 children) Doesn't the name imply only two? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 33 child comments replies: [–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 68 points 2 months ago (13 children) No it implies once every other week Wait permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] synae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 months ago (7 children) Well then what's semisexual?? I'll never get this figured out permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] meekah@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 2 months ago (6 children) that means you like large trucks for hauling commercial goods permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (5 children) Ahhh, so pansexual means that you like half man, half goat people who play the flute? Or is it that you get an erection at the thought of buying new kitchen ware? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] logi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago I've got a hot little Le Crouset simmering in the kitchen 🤤 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) The former, I guess, if this clip rubs you the right way. Does this work? YouTube permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) Link didn't work for me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child) That's why most people just use YouTube. 🫠 Does this work? YouTube permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago The problem seems to be that the video site does not like the Boost app that I was using for lemmy. Their anti-bot software sees it as a bot and blocks it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago Or twice a week? permalink fedilink source parent [–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) Shit, that's the rough life. I'll take the twice a week definition instead please, Trebek. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 child) That'd be semi-weekly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago You mean semi-sexual? permalink fedilink source parent [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago Too real. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 62 points 2 months ago (1 child) The "bi" is for both homosexual and heterosexual relations. Not gender itself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] spinne@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago TIL permalink fedilink source parent [–] Okokimup@lemmy.world 49 points 2 months ago (1 child) Sure but it can be interpreted as "people who share my gender" and "people who do not share my gender." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] percent@infosec.pub 19 points 2 months ago* This is off-topic, but... For some reason, that reminded me of a funny exchange I had with someone who was buying a lottery ticket, years ago... Me: "What are the chances that you'll win?" Him, with a heavy southern (US) accent: "50/50. You either win or you don't." permalink fedilink source parent [+] Planchette_Phantom@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (10 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) Ok but did we really need yet another term that is difficult to distinguish from pre-existing terms? When you have to write an essay to describe it, that should be a clue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Planchette_Phantom@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago A clue to what? That some concepts take more than one second to explain? permalink fedilink source parent [+] bellsfry -15 points 2 months ago (6 children) Actually it originally refers to having two sexes. Aka hermaphroditic. I really hate how the word “sexual” has evolved in meaning into “relating to the activity that evolved to happen between the two main sexes”. We have the perfectly good Greek root “ero” and for some reason we have gradually muddled up the meaning of “sexual”. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 7 points 2 months ago (5 children) In plants* permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] bellsfry -3 points 2 months ago (4 children) It could also be applied to animals meaning something that nowadays would be described as “intersex”. I just think this meaning makes much more sense than “being attracted to two (later multiple) sexes”. If about sexuality and not sex, “bisexual” should just mean “with sexuality related to the number two” based on the etymology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 2 months ago (3 children) I think what you're stuck on is the scientific use of a word and a social use of a word can have different meanings. And depending on context the scientific use can differ. In the case of bisexual, the term was likely used because the preference was for both genitals, since only 2 genders existed to science at that point. Also the term was coined by psychologists in 1890. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] bellsfry 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) Well the modern usage of “bisexual” regarding sexual orientation has also found its way into science, evidenced by the lack of prominent scientific synonyms Which again is irritating because scientific terminology shouldn’t be this lax I think “bisexual” only references two sexes because it was created to describe a phenomenon related to sexual reproduction which evolved to occur between two main sexes; the term was unrelated to gender permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) The modern usage is because scientists used it, not the other way around. It was initially used by psychiatrists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bellsfry 1 point 2 months ago ..thats even worse 💀 permalink fedilink source parent [–] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 months ago* It does, but definitions often diverge from the original over time permalink fedilink source parent [–] purplerabbit@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) A master, and an apprentice. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 months ago Bisithual permalink fedilink source parent [+] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 months ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 68 points 2 months ago (13 children) No it implies once every other week Wait permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] synae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 months ago (7 children) Well then what's semisexual?? I'll never get this figured out permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] meekah@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 2 months ago (6 children) that means you like large trucks for hauling commercial goods permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (5 children) Ahhh, so pansexual means that you like half man, half goat people who play the flute? Or is it that you get an erection at the thought of buying new kitchen ware? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] logi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago I've got a hot little Le Crouset simmering in the kitchen 🤤 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) The former, I guess, if this clip rubs you the right way. Does this work? YouTube permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) Link didn't work for me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child) That's why most people just use YouTube. 🫠 Does this work? YouTube permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago The problem seems to be that the video site does not like the Boost app that I was using for lemmy. Their anti-bot software sees it as a bot and blocks it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago Or twice a week? permalink fedilink source parent [–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) Shit, that's the rough life. I'll take the twice a week definition instead please, Trebek. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 child) That'd be semi-weekly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago You mean semi-sexual? permalink fedilink source parent [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago Too real. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] synae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 months ago (7 children) Well then what's semisexual?? I'll never get this figured out permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] meekah@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 2 months ago (6 children) that means you like large trucks for hauling commercial goods permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (5 children) Ahhh, so pansexual means that you like half man, half goat people who play the flute? Or is it that you get an erection at the thought of buying new kitchen ware? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] logi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago I've got a hot little Le Crouset simmering in the kitchen 🤤 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) The former, I guess, if this clip rubs you the right way. Does this work? YouTube permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) Link didn't work for me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child) That's why most people just use YouTube. 🫠 Does this work? YouTube permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago The problem seems to be that the video site does not like the Boost app that I was using for lemmy. Their anti-bot software sees it as a bot and blocks it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] meekah@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 2 months ago (6 children) that means you like large trucks for hauling commercial goods permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (5 children) Ahhh, so pansexual means that you like half man, half goat people who play the flute? Or is it that you get an erection at the thought of buying new kitchen ware? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] logi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago I've got a hot little Le Crouset simmering in the kitchen 🤤 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) The former, I guess, if this clip rubs you the right way. Does this work? YouTube permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) Link didn't work for me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child) That's why most people just use YouTube. 🫠 Does this work? YouTube permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago The problem seems to be that the video site does not like the Boost app that I was using for lemmy. Their anti-bot software sees it as a bot and blocks it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (5 children) Ahhh, so pansexual means that you like half man, half goat people who play the flute? Or is it that you get an erection at the thought of buying new kitchen ware? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] logi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago I've got a hot little Le Crouset simmering in the kitchen 🤤 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) The former, I guess, if this clip rubs you the right way. Does this work? YouTube permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) Link didn't work for me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child) That's why most people just use YouTube. 🫠 Does this work? YouTube permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago The problem seems to be that the video site does not like the Boost app that I was using for lemmy. Their anti-bot software sees it as a bot and blocks it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] logi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago I've got a hot little Le Crouset simmering in the kitchen 🤤 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) The former, I guess, if this clip rubs you the right way. Does this work? YouTube permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) Link didn't work for me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child) That's why most people just use YouTube. 🫠 Does this work? YouTube permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago The problem seems to be that the video site does not like the Boost app that I was using for lemmy. Their anti-bot software sees it as a bot and blocks it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) Link didn't work for me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child) That's why most people just use YouTube. 🫠 Does this work? YouTube permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago The problem seems to be that the video site does not like the Boost app that I was using for lemmy. Their anti-bot software sees it as a bot and blocks it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child) That's why most people just use YouTube. 🫠 Does this work? YouTube permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago The problem seems to be that the video site does not like the Boost app that I was using for lemmy. Their anti-bot software sees it as a bot and blocks it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago The problem seems to be that the video site does not like the Boost app that I was using for lemmy. Their anti-bot software sees it as a bot and blocks it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago (2 children) Shit, that's the rough life. I'll take the twice a week definition instead please, Trebek. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 child) That'd be semi-weekly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago You mean semi-sexual? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 child) That'd be semi-weekly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago You mean semi-sexual? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago You mean semi-sexual? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 62 points 2 months ago (1 child) The "bi" is for both homosexual and heterosexual relations. Not gender itself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] spinne@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago TIL permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Okokimup@lemmy.world 49 points 2 months ago (1 child) Sure but it can be interpreted as "people who share my gender" and "people who do not share my gender." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] percent@infosec.pub 19 points 2 months ago* This is off-topic, but... For some reason, that reminded me of a funny exchange I had with someone who was buying a lottery ticket, years ago... Me: "What are the chances that you'll win?" Him, with a heavy southern (US) accent: "50/50. You either win or you don't." permalink fedilink source parent
[–] percent@infosec.pub 19 points 2 months ago* This is off-topic, but... For some reason, that reminded me of a funny exchange I had with someone who was buying a lottery ticket, years ago... Me: "What are the chances that you'll win?" Him, with a heavy southern (US) accent: "50/50. You either win or you don't." permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Planchette_Phantom@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (10 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) Ok but did we really need yet another term that is difficult to distinguish from pre-existing terms? When you have to write an essay to describe it, that should be a clue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Planchette_Phantom@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago A clue to what? That some concepts take more than one second to explain? permalink fedilink source parent [+] bellsfry -15 points 2 months ago (6 children) Actually it originally refers to having two sexes. Aka hermaphroditic. I really hate how the word “sexual” has evolved in meaning into “relating to the activity that evolved to happen between the two main sexes”. We have the perfectly good Greek root “ero” and for some reason we have gradually muddled up the meaning of “sexual”. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 7 points 2 months ago (5 children) In plants* permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] bellsfry -3 points 2 months ago (4 children) It could also be applied to animals meaning something that nowadays would be described as “intersex”. I just think this meaning makes much more sense than “being attracted to two (later multiple) sexes”. If about sexuality and not sex, “bisexual” should just mean “with sexuality related to the number two” based on the etymology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 2 months ago (3 children) I think what you're stuck on is the scientific use of a word and a social use of a word can have different meanings. And depending on context the scientific use can differ. In the case of bisexual, the term was likely used because the preference was for both genitals, since only 2 genders existed to science at that point. Also the term was coined by psychologists in 1890. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] bellsfry 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) Well the modern usage of “bisexual” regarding sexual orientation has also found its way into science, evidenced by the lack of prominent scientific synonyms Which again is irritating because scientific terminology shouldn’t be this lax I think “bisexual” only references two sexes because it was created to describe a phenomenon related to sexual reproduction which evolved to occur between two main sexes; the term was unrelated to gender permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) The modern usage is because scientists used it, not the other way around. It was initially used by psychiatrists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bellsfry 1 point 2 months ago ..thats even worse 💀 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) Ok but did we really need yet another term that is difficult to distinguish from pre-existing terms? When you have to write an essay to describe it, that should be a clue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Planchette_Phantom@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago A clue to what? That some concepts take more than one second to explain? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Planchette_Phantom@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago A clue to what? That some concepts take more than one second to explain? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] bellsfry -15 points 2 months ago (6 children) Actually it originally refers to having two sexes. Aka hermaphroditic. I really hate how the word “sexual” has evolved in meaning into “relating to the activity that evolved to happen between the two main sexes”. We have the perfectly good Greek root “ero” and for some reason we have gradually muddled up the meaning of “sexual”. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 7 points 2 months ago (5 children) In plants* permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] bellsfry -3 points 2 months ago (4 children) It could also be applied to animals meaning something that nowadays would be described as “intersex”. I just think this meaning makes much more sense than “being attracted to two (later multiple) sexes”. If about sexuality and not sex, “bisexual” should just mean “with sexuality related to the number two” based on the etymology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 2 months ago (3 children) I think what you're stuck on is the scientific use of a word and a social use of a word can have different meanings. And depending on context the scientific use can differ. In the case of bisexual, the term was likely used because the preference was for both genitals, since only 2 genders existed to science at that point. Also the term was coined by psychologists in 1890. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] bellsfry 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) Well the modern usage of “bisexual” regarding sexual orientation has also found its way into science, evidenced by the lack of prominent scientific synonyms Which again is irritating because scientific terminology shouldn’t be this lax I think “bisexual” only references two sexes because it was created to describe a phenomenon related to sexual reproduction which evolved to occur between two main sexes; the term was unrelated to gender permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) The modern usage is because scientists used it, not the other way around. It was initially used by psychiatrists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bellsfry 1 point 2 months ago ..thats even worse 💀 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 7 points 2 months ago (5 children) In plants* permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] bellsfry -3 points 2 months ago (4 children) It could also be applied to animals meaning something that nowadays would be described as “intersex”. I just think this meaning makes much more sense than “being attracted to two (later multiple) sexes”. If about sexuality and not sex, “bisexual” should just mean “with sexuality related to the number two” based on the etymology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 2 months ago (3 children) I think what you're stuck on is the scientific use of a word and a social use of a word can have different meanings. And depending on context the scientific use can differ. In the case of bisexual, the term was likely used because the preference was for both genitals, since only 2 genders existed to science at that point. Also the term was coined by psychologists in 1890. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] bellsfry 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) Well the modern usage of “bisexual” regarding sexual orientation has also found its way into science, evidenced by the lack of prominent scientific synonyms Which again is irritating because scientific terminology shouldn’t be this lax I think “bisexual” only references two sexes because it was created to describe a phenomenon related to sexual reproduction which evolved to occur between two main sexes; the term was unrelated to gender permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) The modern usage is because scientists used it, not the other way around. It was initially used by psychiatrists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bellsfry 1 point 2 months ago ..thats even worse 💀 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bellsfry -3 points 2 months ago (4 children) It could also be applied to animals meaning something that nowadays would be described as “intersex”. I just think this meaning makes much more sense than “being attracted to two (later multiple) sexes”. If about sexuality and not sex, “bisexual” should just mean “with sexuality related to the number two” based on the etymology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 2 months ago (3 children) I think what you're stuck on is the scientific use of a word and a social use of a word can have different meanings. And depending on context the scientific use can differ. In the case of bisexual, the term was likely used because the preference was for both genitals, since only 2 genders existed to science at that point. Also the term was coined by psychologists in 1890. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] bellsfry 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) Well the modern usage of “bisexual” regarding sexual orientation has also found its way into science, evidenced by the lack of prominent scientific synonyms Which again is irritating because scientific terminology shouldn’t be this lax I think “bisexual” only references two sexes because it was created to describe a phenomenon related to sexual reproduction which evolved to occur between two main sexes; the term was unrelated to gender permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) The modern usage is because scientists used it, not the other way around. It was initially used by psychiatrists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bellsfry 1 point 2 months ago ..thats even worse 💀 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 2 months ago (3 children) I think what you're stuck on is the scientific use of a word and a social use of a word can have different meanings. And depending on context the scientific use can differ. In the case of bisexual, the term was likely used because the preference was for both genitals, since only 2 genders existed to science at that point. Also the term was coined by psychologists in 1890. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] bellsfry 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) Well the modern usage of “bisexual” regarding sexual orientation has also found its way into science, evidenced by the lack of prominent scientific synonyms Which again is irritating because scientific terminology shouldn’t be this lax I think “bisexual” only references two sexes because it was created to describe a phenomenon related to sexual reproduction which evolved to occur between two main sexes; the term was unrelated to gender permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) The modern usage is because scientists used it, not the other way around. It was initially used by psychiatrists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bellsfry 1 point 2 months ago ..thats even worse 💀 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bellsfry 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) Well the modern usage of “bisexual” regarding sexual orientation has also found its way into science, evidenced by the lack of prominent scientific synonyms Which again is irritating because scientific terminology shouldn’t be this lax I think “bisexual” only references two sexes because it was created to describe a phenomenon related to sexual reproduction which evolved to occur between two main sexes; the term was unrelated to gender permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) The modern usage is because scientists used it, not the other way around. It was initially used by psychiatrists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bellsfry 1 point 2 months ago ..thats even worse 💀 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) The modern usage is because scientists used it, not the other way around. It was initially used by psychiatrists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bellsfry 1 point 2 months ago ..thats even worse 💀 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 months ago* It does, but definitions often diverge from the original over time permalink fedilink source parent
[–] purplerabbit@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) A master, and an apprentice. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 months ago Bisithual permalink fedilink source parent