chat

hideshow 13 child comments

parent

[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 20 points 3 years ago (4 children)

some word that was fine then, but is a slur now

It wasn't fine then, you piece of shit.

hideshow 4 child comments

parent

[+] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (3 children)

[removed by mod]

hideshow 3 child comments

parent

[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 17 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

It was definitely not a medically accepted term when social media as we know was created. Nice of you to tell on yourself, though. ”All I did was use a wholesome slurerino and I got CANCELLED for it!”

I also don't know why you think reddit-logo is less tolerant towards writing out ableist slurs than us.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 14 points 3 years ago

Bigot, possible sex pest/creep too, judging by hatred of those evil lying accusers and the unasked for and off-topic rant about "cancel culture." Almost a chud bingo! sus-soviet

parent

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 11 points 3 years ago

I had "nothing to hide" back when cancel culture wasn't a thing and the "rules" weren't in constant flux

Clearly what you're so worked up about is something that is pretty sexy pesty to downright creepy if you're doing the hit-dog-hollering routine here, unasked and unprovoked.

parent

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 15 points 3 years ago (7 children)

You're taking shit out of context

What other context have you provided but complaining about the concept of canceling the way a lot of chuds do?

lot of people getting accused of grooming nowadays

You just voluntarily provided that context just now.

And you're upset about the accusations, not that it indeed does actually happen. Again, like a chud.

there's so many pedos out there these days

Because there are. That isn't new; only the reporting frequency is of what was already happening.

hideshow 7 child comments

parent

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (6 children)

Okay, I'm pretty sure you're trolling, but I'll say this. The more UNJUSTIFIED cancelings I'm talking about aren't things like pedophilia and grooming, but more like gossip and rumors that got out of hand or people digging up tweets from 12 years ago.

Of course I'm a little upset, who wouldn't be upset about strangers playing mind games to accuse them of enjoying one of the worst crimes imaginable?

hideshow 6 child comments

parent

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 12 points 3 years ago (5 children)

Okay, I'm pretty sure you're trolling

No.

As the old saying goes, you doth protest too much. You yourself revealed that your big concern against "cancel culture" is that more people seem to be reporting sexual violence against children than before, and you see that as wrong because you refuse to believe it's possible that it was under-reported before.

It seems like a typical pet issue of western libertarians.

UNJUSTIFIED cancelings

Yeah if your big hangup is that it's "going too far" rather than how weakly the so-called "canceling" that do happen really are (if you think Kevin Spacey's prosecution was "UNJUSTIFIED" there's no hope for you, and if you think it "went too far" that's chuddy to say the least).

who wouldn't be upset about strangers playing mind games

This is getting downright Reddity to me. People are allowed to be on their guard and to call out creeping; what is your solution? Some Reddit-style "punish anyone who doesn't get a successful court conviction of a rapist" retaliation?

hideshow 5 child comments

parent

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (4 children)

I don't even know what you're talking about anymore, so I'm just gonna back out of this conversation.

Believe whatever the hell you wanna believe buddy.

hideshow 4 child comments

parent

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 11 points 3 years ago (2 children)

If you're going to huff and puff about the scary horrors of "cancel culture" when pretty much every big name rich predator that got "canceled" is both not in jail and in many cases still getting paid just like before, you sound like a chud no matter how much you cry about it.

hideshow 2 child comments

parent

[+] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

[removed by mod]

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 14 points 3 years ago*

It's when it happens to John Q. Public and he's ostracized by his peers and immediately a target of the internet that it's an issue.

Again, you're assuming that the accusations are false from the start and are directing your outrage against people that you already assume are lying and out to get you.

with the worst grip on the soap possible

That's a chud take. Monsters deserve fitting punishments, not sexually violent chud revenge fantasies.

parent

[+] Kuori@hexbear.net 1 point 3 years ago

[deleted]