93
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by EmmiLime@lemmy.ml to c/slop@hexbear.net

https://knockout.chat/thread/84117

Imagine having to pay respect to troops who sign up to kill people in the global south to plunder their resources.

——————————————————————————

What kind of answer is this??

——————————————————————————

"MILITARY IMPERIALISM DISCOURSE" LMAO WHAT

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MarxMadness@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They didn't escape gang violence they just went to the most professional gang that offered the best benefits.

There's a real contradiction between how leftists view traditional crime and how leftists view service in the military. Say someone was affiliated with a street gang in their youth and really got in deep at 17. Maybe they didn't personally kill anyone, maybe they weren't even directly involved in a murder, but they worked for an organization that murdered and harmed people. A lot of leftists will emphasize how that person was a kid when they joined, the economic circumstances they grew up in, how limited their personal role was, etc. There's truth to much of that, but we're also talking about a largely self-interested pursuit that largely hurts people. But if that person's twin joins the military at 17, maybe after participating in some sort of ROTC program for a few years before? Then they're not a kid, their circumstances weren't desperate enough, wouldn't a Nazi sweeping floors at a base still be a Nazi, etc.

A street gang isn't the same thing as the military, but we can't correctly note all the similarities and then treat them completely differently.

[-] sodium_nitride@hexbear.net 10 points 2 days ago

You bring up a good point. Certainly there is a similarity in how some people end up joining gangs and how they join the military.

But more than half of military recruits have a family member who served, and military recruits (before joining) have a higher income than the national average.

Yes the 17 year old kid has poor decision making ability. I do not deny this and will not pretend as if everyone in the US military is a sociopathic monster (I have never stated this).

But we actually don't need to infantalise these people by saying that tons of people are rejected for being stupid so anyone who is accepted is also stupid and uwu smol bean and "we should accept 1 disaffected military guy over a 100 liberal streamers who talk about imperialism" which starts to veer into absurd territory

this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
93 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

865 readers
421 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS