▲ 817 ▼ Engineer turns disposable vape pen into a working web server (interestingengineering.com) submitted 4 months ago by TimeNaan@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 178 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (6 children) yeah, no one ever loses an airpod... oh wait permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] abfarid@startrek.website 2 points 4 months ago (5 children) Not sure what you mean. Are you implying that because on occasion some people will lose an AirPod they are somehow worse than vape pods that are designed to be disposed of within days after first use? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (4 children) people who like the concept don't give a fuck about the environment, it's just convenient for them so fuck it. I'm sure you'll justify it for yourself lol. you don't need them, you just like them, and don't care that it's created an entire new class of ewaste. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (3 children) People lose phones more often, huge source of e-waste that we should ban first. In fact most people wouldn't even have a reason to buy the earbuds if they didn't have a phone in the first place. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago* (2 children) People lose phones more often something tells me they don't just evaporate, never to be used used again, but resold. hard to resell a single earbud. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 child) You would be surprised how many go unfound until damaged. Let's just ban it all, better to be safe than sorry. Plus it would really help with your ear bud ban. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago No, I wouldn't. It's all garbage, including your take here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] abfarid@startrek.website 2 points 4 months ago (5 children) Not sure what you mean. Are you implying that because on occasion some people will lose an AirPod they are somehow worse than vape pods that are designed to be disposed of within days after first use? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (4 children) people who like the concept don't give a fuck about the environment, it's just convenient for them so fuck it. I'm sure you'll justify it for yourself lol. you don't need them, you just like them, and don't care that it's created an entire new class of ewaste. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (3 children) People lose phones more often, huge source of e-waste that we should ban first. In fact most people wouldn't even have a reason to buy the earbuds if they didn't have a phone in the first place. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago* (2 children) People lose phones more often something tells me they don't just evaporate, never to be used used again, but resold. hard to resell a single earbud. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 child) You would be surprised how many go unfound until damaged. Let's just ban it all, better to be safe than sorry. Plus it would really help with your ear bud ban. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago No, I wouldn't. It's all garbage, including your take here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (4 children) people who like the concept don't give a fuck about the environment, it's just convenient for them so fuck it. I'm sure you'll justify it for yourself lol. you don't need them, you just like them, and don't care that it's created an entire new class of ewaste. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (3 children) People lose phones more often, huge source of e-waste that we should ban first. In fact most people wouldn't even have a reason to buy the earbuds if they didn't have a phone in the first place. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago* (2 children) People lose phones more often something tells me they don't just evaporate, never to be used used again, but resold. hard to resell a single earbud. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 child) You would be surprised how many go unfound until damaged. Let's just ban it all, better to be safe than sorry. Plus it would really help with your ear bud ban. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago No, I wouldn't. It's all garbage, including your take here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (3 children) People lose phones more often, huge source of e-waste that we should ban first. In fact most people wouldn't even have a reason to buy the earbuds if they didn't have a phone in the first place. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago* (2 children) People lose phones more often something tells me they don't just evaporate, never to be used used again, but resold. hard to resell a single earbud. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 child) You would be surprised how many go unfound until damaged. Let's just ban it all, better to be safe than sorry. Plus it would really help with your ear bud ban. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago No, I wouldn't. It's all garbage, including your take here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago* (2 children) People lose phones more often something tells me they don't just evaporate, never to be used used again, but resold. hard to resell a single earbud. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 child) You would be surprised how many go unfound until damaged. Let's just ban it all, better to be safe than sorry. Plus it would really help with your ear bud ban. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago No, I wouldn't. It's all garbage, including your take here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 child) You would be surprised how many go unfound until damaged. Let's just ban it all, better to be safe than sorry. Plus it would really help with your ear bud ban. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago No, I wouldn't. It's all garbage, including your take here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago No, I wouldn't. It's all garbage, including your take here. permalink fedilink source parent