you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (14 children)

Who benefits from the government buying 50% overvalued shares? And when these companies inevitably fail, why should half the cost be socialized?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago (13 children)

    It's not buying it, it's seizing it. That's means taking by force, you don't pay for that. Try reading.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (12 children)

    The US is a bourgeois state, this is not the working classes siezing it but the capitalists collectively.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago (11 children)

    It wouldn't even happen under the current government. Republicans and liberals are too afraid of what they call government overreach.

    Bernie isn't a capitalist, I think y'all are wayyyy overthinking this one lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    Bernie is a social democrat, which sides with capital over socialism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    How does social democracy affirm capitalism over socialism? By maintaining private ownership of the means of production without transitioning to a dictatorship of the proletariat. How is Bernie a social democrat? By holding to reform over revolution, and siding with the US over overthrowing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (7 children)

    Who is the main driving force of the revolution?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    The working classes, I don't see the immediate relevance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    My point is the "revolution" you are gesturing to isn't there.

    The working class right now doesn't work together, Bernie and people like him are trying to get them together, but you needlessly nitpicking doesn't do one fucking iota to a revolution.

    Anyway left is better, and no that doesn't include neo libs and their obvious attraction to the right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    In order to actually organize, it's important to align in an actual working class political party. Bernie is working within the Democrats and not supporting actual movement away from them. I am not "needlessly nitpicking," revolutionary strategy requires building up a revolutionary org like PSL.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    What has the PSL accomplished?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    A lot! They've been spearheading a lot of the anti-war and anti-ICE protests, help run community drives and organize tenant and worker unions, and have been growing a revolutionary organization with trained cadres. This is exactly what a revolutionary org needs to do, organize the working classes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments