Being against public surveillance doesn’t mean I want to abolish ALL forms of law enforcement/ crime prevention.

My concern (living the UK, a country with a disproportionate number of cctv) is that a society with extensive surveillance infrastructure creates the capability for abuse tomorrow. Once cameras, facial recognition systems, vehicle tracking, and data retention systems exist, future governments inherit those powers regardless of their good intent (or not as the case may be).

It’s already happening here. These systems are being used for “behaviour analysis” and tracking of lawful activities like protests and political activity. They his kind of mission creep is a slippery slope.

There is also the question of effectiveness. The UK has one of the highest densities of CCTV cameras in the democratic world, yet evidence on their impact varies significantly. There is little statistical reduction in inner city crime as a result beyond drug crime (20%), which in my opinion could be handled in a much more positive way.

I can’t speak for other countries.

So yeah, I am anti government surveillance.

Ah yes, because there is no space between a surveillance state and "disbanding all forms of law enforcement"

FFS at least try to argue in good faith.

You should take your own advice