51
What would be your opinion on a lemmy/piefed instance that's run like Athen democracy? (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 months ago by cinoreus@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
58 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Experimental thought, but something I want to do in near future.

Basically admins and mods are selected sortitionally( randomly) from people who apply.

All admins and mods have fixed term limits.

Existence of Mod or Admin trials where a public chat(court) decides consequences for their actions, if they misbehave, could lead to

Ever since I learnt about the sortition system, I was incredibly curious how it would work irl, hence this idea.

Look, I am not going to claim this is a solution to anything, till ones actually up and running I think it's hard to say which direction it will go. But still, I want your opinion on it.

On How to encourage people to mod a community?

By making mod duty easy for them, have small term limits, and in those term limits they only have to work for 4/3 days a week. Term could be just few weeks. Also get lot more mods and give them specific time slots beyond which they are vastly not needed unless an emergency.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cinoreus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I am completely sober but the Idea I got is more insane than yours.

The trust thing basically cannot work for me. It's not only expensive, but I don't think it's a good idea to operate a social media trust from my jurisdiction( India ). So if anyone wants to go forward with trusts, it must be someone from Europe not me.

The idea I have, which honestly sounds crazy, but may be the only way individual owners can run these instances, is the idea of mutually assured destruction. Basically, why, despite having nukes, have we not used them yet? Because nuclear attack means both the partners will mutually assured destruction.

Similarly, if I give admins and server owner both the power to delete the server, with admins having to vote a simple majority in order to do so, it basically creates a mutually assured destruction scenario, where both have to co-operate.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Similarly, if I give admins and server owner both the power to delete the server, with admins having to vote a simple majority in order to do so, it basically creates a mutually assured destruction scenario, where both have to co-operate.

if you were an instance owner you would also want to run that by your lawyer. i'm not a lawyer but i have not had coffee and i can see four different scenarios that having a killswitch like that would get you in neck deep shit. stuff like willful and premeditated destruction of evidence, depending on the severity, blah blah blah. short version, everyone i work with works in pen, not pencil. not because we're that good (we are) but because if we need to remove something from any records, you (generally) do it by amending the record to show the correction, not deleting the error.

this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
51 points (85.9% liked)

Fediverse

43447 readers
157 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
Xylinna@lemmy.world
MrCenny@lemmy.world
automodbeta@lemmy.world
woelkchen@lemmy.world