you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

I used Arch for 10 years and in that time I could literally count on one hand how many times my system broke. Three of those times were user error. I was on CachyOS for about a year and a half and never once had issues. Now on Artix and I've once had my system get borked once (due to one package that was an easy downgrade). I'd hardly call 3 system borks in ~13 years "inevitable instability". Rolling release =/= constant breakage. I wish this myth about Arch and Arch based distros would die.

I agree about Cachy's improvements being meh. I noticed very little improvement (barely perceptible if at all) going from Arch to Cachy. I mostly stayed with it as long as I did for convenience.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    At the age of 67, having tried and used everything, not just booted a vm, but honestly used, I found Arch a much higher maintenance burden. System borking changes are definitely a thing - see the "needs manual intervention" messages that happen often. I know Arch users seem to revel in this and gloss over it. Thats fine for them but I no longer get any sense of personal empowerment from tedious obsessive hand holding of any operating system. To me it's just unnecessary distracting extra work.

  • source
  • parent