you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 20 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

Lmao. Is there anywhere they can go that wouldn't immediately block them?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    He can use a locally hosted gitea

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Of course he can... But then it's as simple as a DDoS attack to shut it down. He wouldn't want to host it on his own equipment, because there is a huge possibility for attack. He can pay for a server, but I assume he'd just setup the one. Unless he pays for a distributed server setup, there would be a single point of failure, and a single server to overwhelm. He can use CloudFlare, but then CloudFlare can decide they don't like his content either, and just block access altogether.

    All of those things are much harder with an existing website with a larger infrastructure, and content other than his own posts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    *they

    the researcher's pronouns and such are unknown at this time as they have remained anonymous

    assuming male as default for everyone leads to trans people getting misgendered and is just generally a shitty out-of-touch thing to do

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Have you considered the possibility that aggressively interjecting pronoun arguments into unrelated conversations and implying people are shitty and out of touch is eroding public support for trans rights?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Sorry, but if your allyship is so fragile that someone being a dick online can wiaver it, you were never an ally.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Do you want more allies? Chasing away reluctant ones seems counterproductive to me TBH.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I happened to pick up in the article the neutral pronoun and have avoided it, but to accuse a pretty casual use of a prounoun as being a shitty thing to do is.. a shitty thing to do.

    Incidentally, I hate the plural pronoun as the stand in for unspecified. Especially when talking about a company versus an individual, it is useful to use the plural to refer to company and a singular for the individual. Otherwise it's a vague mess. It's so confusing when folks are using plural to refer to singular people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I happened to pick up in the article the neutral pronoun and have avoided it, but to accuse a pretty casual use of a prounoun as being a shitty thing to do is.. a shitty thing to do.

    Why should misgendering be treated with more respect than the respect given?

    Incidentally, I hate the plural pronoun as the stand in for unspecified. Especially when talking about a company versus an individual, it is useful to use the plural to refer to company and a singular for the individual. Otherwise it's a vague mess. It's so confusing when folks are using plural to refer to singular people.

    Sorry but they has always been both singular and plural.

    'Can you flag the waiter when they're not busy?' Has always been grammatically correct. Its always been the 'I'm not sure option'. You don't say he/she when you don't know how to refer to someone, you use they.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_they

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    Why should misgendering be treated with more respect than the respect given?

    You imply they intended some disrespect. They used a default pronoun and when asked to do otherwise they obliged, despite being immediately accused of doing a shitty thing. Folks are being offended on behalf of a person that hasn't said anything about how that person feels one way or another.

    A "could you use a non-specific pronoun instead of masculine when you don't know" might have gone a long way, but implying some mundane default use of a pronoun is malicious and shitty is just a really excessive amount of vitriol when absolutely nothing was meant by any of it.

    I know about singular they, but I don't like it. Perhaps because there was a movement in my childhood education to "correct" the use of singular they, as noted in that wikipedia article there was significant pressure for hundreds of years to make people not use plural pronouns singularly. I for one wish that a singular, human appropriate, non-specific personal pronoun emerged because singular "they" just grates my nerves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    Just because you didn't intend to disrespect someone, doesnt mean you didn't. Impact over intent every time. Its a shitty thing to do. So someone should kiss your ass and hold your hand through misgendering someone?

    Your personal gripes about they are frankly just your opinion on them, and I'm not givibg it more weight that that.

    Like I said in a different reply,

    This is people asking for the respect and thought to you know, check a profile before you speak. No one here got offended, it was called out as a dick move, as it should have been.

    If you don't see that as basic respect, thats part of the problem.

    EDIT: it's the same level of respect as spelling someone's name correctly.

    Its kinda shitty thing to do. Mistakes happen, but it says a lot when people dig their heels in.

  • source
  • parent