71
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 May 2026
71 points (100.0% liked)
Chapotraphouse
14375 readers
679 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
moves ships 200 miles away, the bases are negotiated negotiated negotiated boom another war
If Iran is smart they'll use the time a deal like this buys them to get nukes. That way the US can't come back later to bomb again.
Everybody on hexbear is really confident that just having nukes will be a magic shield of safety for Iran and the world and I really wish I could be so, so confident that the U.S. isn't actually led by mad dogs who would go "well we learned a lot about Iranian missiles and drones the last time, now we're ready!" and start nuclear war
Like yea dawg i hope so but uh i think if U.S. leaders were rational they'd have realized attacking iran at this moment in time would have gone exactly this way. They needed to do this 20 years ago or not at all without China/Russia supporting it (so, not at all).
You could say Korea not being attacked supports the idea but I don't think there are as many reasons for the U.S. to want to topple the DPRK vs Iran and that's without even considering Israel
Nukes sure do seem like a magical shield of safety. Iran can be relentlessly harassed without them. When Libya gives them up they can be turned into a failed state in a few years.
What would the alternative be though? Iran just doesn't get nukes and the US 100% bombs them again? From Iran's perspective at this point there'd be no real downside to getting nukes. If the US does start nuclear war then it's just like become everyone elses problem instead of just theirs. So like yeah maybe it won't work, but I see no reason they wouldn't give it a go.