▲ 618 ▼ Dog shoots woman with shotgun at Nebraska convenience store (www.theguardian.com) submitted 3 months ago by abacabadabacaba@infosec.pub to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world 221 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 1 point 3 months ago (3 children) That would just discriminate against poor people and people that live in high crime areas. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 child) It would promote responsible gun ownership. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 3 points 3 months ago (1 child) Plenty of rich people are irresponsible permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 child) Plenty of poor people have driving licences and are insured too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 months ago Though using IDs for rights in the US has historically been seen as racist (voting,) so technically we shouldn't even be IDd for guns or we should get background checked to make sure felons don't vote. Not that I agree we should actually do either of those things but y'know, consistancy applied and all. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bss03@infosec.pub 4 points 3 months ago It would do that, but it wouldn't just do that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 4 points 3 months ago What kind of idiot takes a gun into a high-crime area? Great way to end up mugged or killed for your gun. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 child) It would promote responsible gun ownership. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 3 points 3 months ago (1 child) Plenty of rich people are irresponsible permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 child) Plenty of poor people have driving licences and are insured too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 months ago Though using IDs for rights in the US has historically been seen as racist (voting,) so technically we shouldn't even be IDd for guns or we should get background checked to make sure felons don't vote. Not that I agree we should actually do either of those things but y'know, consistancy applied and all. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 3 points 3 months ago (1 child) Plenty of rich people are irresponsible permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 child) Plenty of poor people have driving licences and are insured too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 months ago Though using IDs for rights in the US has historically been seen as racist (voting,) so technically we shouldn't even be IDd for guns or we should get background checked to make sure felons don't vote. Not that I agree we should actually do either of those things but y'know, consistancy applied and all. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 child) Plenty of poor people have driving licences and are insured too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 months ago Though using IDs for rights in the US has historically been seen as racist (voting,) so technically we shouldn't even be IDd for guns or we should get background checked to make sure felons don't vote. Not that I agree we should actually do either of those things but y'know, consistancy applied and all. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 months ago Though using IDs for rights in the US has historically been seen as racist (voting,) so technically we shouldn't even be IDd for guns or we should get background checked to make sure felons don't vote. Not that I agree we should actually do either of those things but y'know, consistancy applied and all. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bss03@infosec.pub 4 points 3 months ago It would do that, but it wouldn't just do that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 4 points 3 months ago What kind of idiot takes a gun into a high-crime area? Great way to end up mugged or killed for your gun. permalink fedilink source parent