▲ 126 ▼ US House Unveiled Plan to Charge $130 [Yearly] Fee for Electric Vehicles (www.bloomberg.com) submitted 3 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world 40 comments fedilink hide all child comments This is more than the average fossil car owner pays in gas taxes, and really bad policy during a world fuel shortage.
[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 months ago (2 children) And what about states that already charge? Texas charges $200/yr for EVs for the same reason. Will we be double taxed? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TheWilliamist@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago It is $250 a year for Ohio. permalink fedilink source parent [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Well, ICE cars already are. I don’t know about Texas but certainly here in California there’s federal taxes on gasoline and state taxes. The state taxes are always explicitly paying for road maintenance, and the federal taxes pay for “infrastructure” in a vague but probably reasonable manner. We’re all getting lost on the weeds on this one, but in general both the states and the feds are looking to make up the revenue needed to support road infrastructure lost when someone doesn’t buy gas. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago And a reasonable person realizes that probably has to happen, but would look for a fair way to do it. A magat looks for a way to hold back any technology that doesn’t enrich their buddies permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheWilliamist@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago It is $250 a year for Ohio. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Well, ICE cars already are. I don’t know about Texas but certainly here in California there’s federal taxes on gasoline and state taxes. The state taxes are always explicitly paying for road maintenance, and the federal taxes pay for “infrastructure” in a vague but probably reasonable manner. We’re all getting lost on the weeds on this one, but in general both the states and the feds are looking to make up the revenue needed to support road infrastructure lost when someone doesn’t buy gas. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago And a reasonable person realizes that probably has to happen, but would look for a fair way to do it. A magat looks for a way to hold back any technology that doesn’t enrich their buddies permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago And a reasonable person realizes that probably has to happen, but would look for a fair way to do it. A magat looks for a way to hold back any technology that doesn’t enrich their buddies permalink fedilink source parent