1000
Bitwarden's new CEO has a Private Equity background, removed 'Inclusion' and 'Always Free' from their website -- because of course he did (www.fastcompany.com)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
229 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

In the latest episode of "they will always sell you out" - they sold you out! Who would've thought.

Hoping for a good alternative client to appear, the writing is on the wall. Vaultwarden can't exist without "leeching" off of Bitwarden.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yes, no conflicts. I don't know if you can only share part of vault; I just created a separate one for a separate team.

I wouldn't put it in Google Drive or anything like that. The separate sync logic will definitely cause conflicts.

I'm not worried about having access if I'm offline, because if I'm offline I'm not going to be able to log into anything anyway.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    I guess a laptop, server, IoT device, or WiFi connection when your main device doesn't have internet is out of scope for you?
    Like fixing my laptop and not wanting to type the new password into my phone instead of copy/paste, sync when online?
    And how are you sharing a file, to multiple people anywhere in the world realtime ish, without a cloud service you or someone else hosts? Doesn't that necessitate some syncronization logic?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •