you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 4 months ago (3 children)

The goal of safety design of vehicles is to dissipate as much energy as possible, at no expense to one or the other side.

This is still a rather mild accident of a pasanger vehicle rear-ending a bus. But it's made so much worse simply because of both-sided idiotic vehicle designs.

Most of the world realised that and rectified it rather qucikly.

One car getting under another car is never the "safe" solution.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Are you talking about ideal safety design, or American design IRL?

    Because weve been in a weight and height arms-race for decades explicitly because whoever weighs more and is higher is safer, at the expense of the other vehicle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    The cars I'm talking about are far from ideal. Ideal cars would look awful, and since, "for some reason", we're very touchy about what a car should look like, it's a shape of an inefficient, unsafe brick.

    But yes, the issue is the arms race, as you've put it. And it's starting to infect Europe as well, so education on vehicle safety is paramount.

    Vechicle safety is not "as long as I'm in a tank - I'm safe, and that's all that matters". (This is not aimed at you)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment