you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Copacetic -- it was just invented as a fake word to mean OK, all clear

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago* (3 children)

    There are no such thing as fake words, the only deciding factor of whether a word is "real" is usage, if enough use it, it becomes "real"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Fair, but I think in the context of an etymology thread it's fair to say a word that came from nowhere, that someone thought they were inventing anew, is "less real" than all the origins at work here. But I appreciate the relativism, descriptivism, and hyanuboinism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I've just invented it from no sources, but I've taken it to mean "intending to inform and correct a future misunderstanding, without correcting the present statement"

    I don't have my IPA memorized, but in my accent I propose "high-annu-boyn-ism", in case anyone wanted to use it out loud.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Makes me wonder what is a critical amount of people to use a word for it to realify

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    There's a fun thing called a "friendly language", which is any pseudolanguage spoken by a insulated group of 2 or more people, and not spoken by the outside group

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    That doesn't make it a part of another language though, which is what I was thinking of.

    But you're right, as long as communication is successful, it is a language, I guess

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments