you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 21 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (16 children)
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago (10 children)

    What? I completely get discarding things and living a life without the burden of clutter, but having a game in your Steam library is essentially zero cost/burden right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (7 children)
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Games are meant to be played, not collected.

    I'm not a gamer myself (the only game I ever purchased are a few chessboards ;) but as a book reader I know many people do buy books they will never ever read. They just collect dust on their bookshelves. It may be sad they don't get to enjoy the content, but it's their choice and there is nothing wrong with that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I hope it's the loud minority that buys that many games. I think most people don't have the luxury to think that way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    I have over 200 games (not the largest library I know but still sizable) and most of them are unplayed and never will be. A majority of them come from the monthly Humble Bundle subscription that gives me like 7-12 games a month. I haven't redeemed any in a while, I mainly keep the sub for the store discount, and the mild feeling of goodwill I receive for having donated to "charity" (since Humble's acquisition by EA I question how much of this goes to charity).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago*

    Especially since you can hide them if you want to maintain a clean interface. That way you can bring them back later if you decide to replay the game, or share it with your family. There's so few reasons to ever delete a game.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    this sounds like just throwing your money away. I think it definitely takes the cake for weird/interesting habits.

    I agree, it costs nothing to not delete them, and if they ever added a framework later on for reselling or trading, you're just out money.

    Not to mention if you wrote a review for any of the games, I'm expect deleting the game from your library unmarks the game as you owning it, which means that your review no longer contributes to the game's rating.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    I fully understand not wanting them in the library. How I go about it is I have a category that's called finished, and when I finish a game, I remove them from all categories, except for finished, and then I hide/collapse that category. Alternatively, you can also filter by installed games.

    I have a review for most of the games that I've played, but almost none of them actually count towards the game score because Steam has a really stupid way of deciding if a review actually counts or not. basically, for a review to count, you have to own the game or have refunded the game(I'm nit sure if deleting the game counts as refunding). And it must have been purchased directly through Steam. and it has to meet whatever Automated metrics they have in the background to decide whether or not it's a bot review or not.

    I've had fully valid games that I purchased through Steam just not get included in the review system because something I sent in the review triggered some form of abuse system.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    Can you remove paid games from your library? I have removed a few f2p ones, most notably Apex Legends after removal of linux support. Turns out you can add them back and your hours, achievements will be right back.

  • source
  • parent