you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

Context switching isn’t just X — it’s Y.

Are we sure this was written by a human?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    AI being released was basically an apocalypse for people who use EM dash.

    Here's the most cited, human created (2001), paper on the topic of context switching performance loss: https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/xhp274763.pdf

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Thanks.

    And I'm all for em dashes. After all, I started using them after reading enough books. It's just that particular construct that strikes me as especially LLM-y.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    AI was trained on human writing. If it produces a certain tone, then that's probably a result of the material that was favoured in training it. That construction was common in human writing before it became common in AI too.

    What makes it stick out is when AI uses it in contexts where humans normally wouldn't, but this kind of assertion is common in scientific papers and articles. It would make sense to train an AI on scientific writing, since that tone sounds authoritative and like you have some idea of what you're talking about.

    So I don't think this is an LLM-construct; it's an instance of the original style that LLMs copy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments