you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 40 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Survivorship bias. We only see the "good old programs" because the bad ones didn't make it until now.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Yes

    And while not exactly applicable for the computer example but generally everytime this example is brought up

    ROMANS DID NOT HAVE 40 FUCKING TON TRUCKS

    Much less so 100s per hour

    Roman infrastructure was/is impressive no doubt

    But not that impressive

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    Sure, but we have been running the same Linux command line tools now for the 30 years ive been on Linux. None of them have had any noticable bugs and none of them have been replaced, until maybe now recently with some rust versions that are still not default.

    They are incredibly actually. We dont have that in software engineering anymore. We add features and bloat to all modern software until it needs to be replaced.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    Kind of sad isn't it? I had some lengthy discussions with someone who worked for Atari in the 70s/80s and the amount of magic they worked with limited hardware was something else.. Sadly I was a young drunk and don't remember much of what he said.

  • source
  • parent