294
I Asked AI to Count My Carbs 27,000 Times. It Couldn’t Give Me the Same Answer Twice. (www.diabettech.com)
submitted 5 months ago* by to c/technology@lemmy.world
81 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hacker News

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

It's the job of the company and especially the face and CEO of the company to sell the product. Compared to Sam Altman's promises, the use in this post is practically modest.

If you think this isn't the case, maybe you can point to some ChatGPT marketing that would make it clear what correct, and especially incorrect usage would look like?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    They don't. They say we made this thing, see what you can do with it. They also put disclaimers on ChatGPT to say not to rely on it to be correct.

    One can infer from that, that any use for which you are relying on accuracy is incorrect use. Which is why it's critical to have any output filtered through a domain-capable human.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    They don't.

    "The thing that I think will be most impactful on that five to ten year timeframe is AI will actually discover new science." - Sam Altman

    This is what the face of OpenAI explicitly says their product is for. Do you have anything more concrete? Or am I just to buy into this infinite good faith and assume that anything dumb Trump Sammy says is just hyperbole?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    He's not selling anything specific and not to end users. You're talking about something completely different. The way Sam and investors and corporate customers talk about AI is pretty misleading, but it's not misleading users. No one looks at AI replacing CSRs and inventing new sciences, whatever the fuck that means, and jumps to it can unerringly diagnose a rash. And even if they did, the bot explicitly says not to trust it.

    If some dirt farmer asks it how to avoid losing his family farm in a drought and takes ChatGPT's advice to plant chocolate chips and loses the farm anyway, I suggest that's a user error.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    We might as well be discussing whether the tobacco industry has mislead customers because they have a little disclaimer on their cartons.

    Mainstream media publishes Sammy's statements uncritically. ChatGPT releases ads. It's extremely clear he is misleading the general public, his users. I don't know why you're in denial over this.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent