you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 3 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 14 points 3 years ago* (2 children)

    I'd note that almost all of the headshots there have a lot of makeup, and the named ones are almost certainly professional makeup.

    You don't even see light makeup until the 7s and 6.5 range. Damn neckbeard(s?) don't even know what a woman actually looks like, and apparently expect women to pay for a professional cosmetologist to do them up before they leave the house.

    Edit: it might be an amusing experiment to post those given a "9.5", but from a shot where they have their normal day to day "face" on and see what rank they get. Or at least how long until its deleted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago

    I wonder how many people would actually sort them similar to how they're sorted in the first picture.

    Because to me the distribution of attractive people between 5.0 and 10 seems to be completely random.

  • source
  • parent