342
What movie franchise gets worse with each new film? (thelemmy.club)
submitted 4 months ago* by to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
300 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The first Jurassic Park movie is all time one of the greatest films ever made with the special effects still holding up to this day. The 2nd film was still very enjoyable in my opinion but it was just a cookie cutter sequel not bad, not good. The 3rd film wasnโ€™t great at all. But compared to the rest of the series the 3rd film is basically the godfather.

As another personal pick the 1st blade movie is a hood classic good. The other 2 not so much.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 21 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Pirates of the carabian.
The first was a masterpiece in comedy.
The second and third were good but I would still rate them slightly worse each gen.
I am indifferent to 4 and hate 5

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [โ€“] 12 points 4 months ago

    The first movie was a complete package that told a story well, and where it ended was the right place to end it all.

    But of course, money.

    Really tarnished my feelings about the first movie and I don't think I could even watch it the same way anymore.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 7 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I thought 3 was a deal better than 2. 2 was generic Hollywood schlock that dragged in the middle; 3 at least attempted some interesting things, and even bordered on artsy at times.

    1 was, of course, the best. Haven't seen 4 and 5.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [โ€“] 3 points 4 months ago

    I see 2 and 3 as one continuous story. Lord Cutler Beckett is basically the personification of capitalism and industrialism. He spends his time killing or taking over these "free" people who all do whatever they want whenever they want with no masters and no one telling them what to do, and subjugating them under the yoke of the changing new world.

    Idk I'm kinda high right now. I like Beckett as a villain, because he represents certain aspects of the human spirit and he is at the end just a dude. He's not an immortal squid-man and he's not an undead were-skeleton.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 2 points 4 months ago

    I actually thought 4 was better than 2 and 3. Not that 4 was very good, but I thought 2 and 3 suffered from an attempt to, "trilogize," the series and make it a grand epic. It was clear by the end of the third movie that they didn't know where they were going with all of the plot threads they'd set up like Calypso, the Brethren Court, the Jack/Elizabeth/Will love triangle they were hinting at...just way to many ideas and very little payoff. At least 4 told a coherent story in one movie, even if it wasn't a very good story.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent