745
Borders (thelemmy.club)
submitted 4 months ago by [M] to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
189 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 4 months ago (14 children)

Good to know that Humans are a Hivemind. Until now I acctually disliked borders. But I am a Human, and you say Humans like Borders. Man thanks for the Warning. I will be working on adapting the Hiveminds Opinion.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (9 children)

    But we DO form similar social structures to that of wolf packs. The majority of human history has been one of tribadism

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Pretty sure you mean tribalism.

    Tribadism (NSFW) is something different.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    To be fair the majority of human history has involved tribadism

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago* (4 children)

    But it stays an Argument purly on Nature. And someone still needs to explain to me why nature automatically means better.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    These are processes that'll just happen organically and those usually have the least upkeep. If something is made artificially it needs to be artificially maintained. I'll be honest, I am personally against borders, I greatly enjoy open borders in the EU but the fact that borders form naturally is a process we'd be aware of. Just like wealth accumulation in capitalism, its a natural conclusion that'd take measures to avoid.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    Our entire world couldn't be more far away from what nature once was. And there are just so many "artificial" things that have proven to be better than nature. What I'm saying is that just saying that something is natural really does mean nothing. I can be both, good or bad. It's not like I'm denying nature. Because you said that I need to be aware of it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Why are some things that some animals do used as a justification for humans to do the same, while other animals doing something else isn't?

    For example, Wikipedia says this about the topic:

    Territoriality is only shown by a minority of species. More commonly, an individual or a group of animals occupies an area that it habitually uses but does not necessarily defend; this is called its home range. The home ranges of different groups of animals often overlap, and in these overlap areas the groups tend to avoid each other rather than seeking to confront and expel each other.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territory_(animal)

    It is natural to not have borders, and only a few species do.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Also, I'd like to know why one animal doing one thing is used to justify human behaviour as "natural" while another animal doing something else is not. (Or even the same animal doing something else is not.)

    There are tons of non-territorial animals, for example.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Well borders are rather useful and good. Everyone has boundaries with other people, it's even kinda mandatory for mental well-being. Everyone has borders with their home. Those are even legally enforceable.

    I'm fairly sure you'd be rather pissed off if i would randomly walk into your home and started harassing you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I'm not the State. You are confusing personal boundaries with state borders. Totally different topics. Always a nice try to place state interests into personal interests of an individual. Oldest trick in the book. That's just like that argument that I need to go die for my country because if I was personally attacked on the street I would also defend myself. These are totally different scenarios. We can live together in big scale while still having private spaces. These things can coexist.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -1 points 4 months ago

    I'd say it's the exact same principle, just scaled up.
    From personal boundaries and home rules, which are set up by each individual themselves. To HOA or apartment complex equivalents boundaries and rules which are set up by democratic voting(hopefully). To a district or state rules and boundaries to country to unions.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent