187
California’s wildlife bridge became a target for the right. Now it’s eyeing the finish line (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 4 months ago by to c/solarpunk@slrpnk.net
34 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 4 months ago (4 children)

Yeah, but that's just not going to work with the geography involved here, because there's mountains to one side, and a stream to the other. The wildlife bridge is connecting two protected natural areas, which makes it perfect for wildlife, horrible for construction.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (3 children)

    ... are we talking about the same bridge? I don't see mountains or a stream.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    If you can't see the mountains in the big picture at the top of that article, I can't help you, but here's an actual map of the area showing the stream:

    https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18%2F34.138007%2F-118.728733

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (1 child)

    Error 429 Unknown Error

    Unknown Error
    Error 54113

    Details: cache-msp11840-MSP 1777185070 3320192906

    Varnish cache server

    Something's broke.

    In the picture I see mountains miles away in the distance and I definitely don't see a steam, you're talking like the mountains and stream are right next to the bridge. At most there's a hill next to the highway, and then on the other side looks like another road. No stream.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •