▲ 569 ▼ YSK: even modest increases in time spent outdoors significantly reduces a child's odds of developing short-sightedness (lemmy.ca) submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca to c/youshouldknow@lemmy.world 98 comments fedilink hide all child comments As one meta-analysis put it: It’s estimated that an increase of one hour per day of outdoor time could reduce the occurrence of myopia in children by 45%. Make sure your kids spend time outside, folks!
[–] nope@jlai.lu 108 points 4 months ago (4 children) I was outside a lot and still got myopia :3 permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Stern@lemmy.world 46 points 4 months ago Congrats on the luck permalink fedilink source parent [–] cenotaph@piefed.zip 25 points 4 months ago Then you were likely genetically predetermined to be at least a little myopic, but if you spent less time outside during your developmental phases you would likely be even more nearsighted than you are now. permalink fedilink source parent [–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago (2 children) Same for me, I spent most of my free time as a child playing outside. I grew up in California, weather wasn't a concern, I was outside year-'round. I got my first pair of glasses at age 21. I suspect it's far more genetic than environmental. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child) It’s both. You can just look at the statistics, the number of people with myopia has gone up over the last few decades. If it was just genetics those numbers would have been stable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 child) Well, unless nearsighted people were outcompeting people with 20:20 vision, for some reason. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago I've been told I look better with my glasses on. permalink fedilink source parent [–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago N=1 permalink fedilink source parent [–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 child) N=1 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] chunes@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cenotaph@piefed.zip 25 points 4 months ago Then you were likely genetically predetermined to be at least a little myopic, but if you spent less time outside during your developmental phases you would likely be even more nearsighted than you are now. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago (2 children) Same for me, I spent most of my free time as a child playing outside. I grew up in California, weather wasn't a concern, I was outside year-'round. I got my first pair of glasses at age 21. I suspect it's far more genetic than environmental. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child) It’s both. You can just look at the statistics, the number of people with myopia has gone up over the last few decades. If it was just genetics those numbers would have been stable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 child) Well, unless nearsighted people were outcompeting people with 20:20 vision, for some reason. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago I've been told I look better with my glasses on. permalink fedilink source parent [–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago N=1 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child) It’s both. You can just look at the statistics, the number of people with myopia has gone up over the last few decades. If it was just genetics those numbers would have been stable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 child) Well, unless nearsighted people were outcompeting people with 20:20 vision, for some reason. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago I've been told I look better with my glasses on. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 child) Well, unless nearsighted people were outcompeting people with 20:20 vision, for some reason. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago I've been told I look better with my glasses on. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago I've been told I look better with my glasses on. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 child) N=1 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] chunes@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent