you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 4 months ago (4 children)

They all have support of industrialized areas. None of them are/were an-prim.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (3 children)

    Not sure if I understand you correctly. You say that all of them are importing industrial goods? That doesn't imply that they are not anprim.

    Let me know if I misinterpret you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I mean, none of them would describe themselves as an-prim.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    Does it matter which tags they associate with? As long as they are not doing industry, and living with nature, that's all that matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    The Viet Cong and Kurdistanis are "living with nature"? I don't even know what that really means. It also seems to me to be against the spirit (if not the practice) of anprim to simply outsource industry.

    Like I said at first, I think it (anprim) sounds nice but only as a kind of vague ideal. Fun to think about, but I can't take it seriously as any kind of revolutionary aspiration. And again, I don't think any of your examples (which are worth taking seriously, btw) are anything like my understanding of anprim.

  • source
  • parent