you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 6 months ago (15 children)

Cars:

Have air conditioning

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 6 months ago (10 children)

    And a lot of areas would be cooler without cars its crazy how much a traffic jam heats up an area when you have a bunch of cars idling

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 6 months ago (9 children)

    chopping down all the trees and paving a 12 ft wide strip of black tarmac so cars can even drive there in the first place also massively increases the temperature

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (8 children)

    Good thing we have air conditioners then

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    If you bike up a hill then you get to coast down it and that's like the lord's air conditioning

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    But then i'd have to change my clothes when i get to work

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    You can either:

    • Bike in a less physically strenuous way so you are not so sweaty that you need a change of clothes
    • carry a change of clothes.

    In Denmark it's very normal for people to do the latter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 27 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Cars:

    Also require everything to be further away, increasing your time in extreme weather.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    there's like three layers of civil engineering between cars and me living too far from the grocery store to walk there. you could make an incrementalist improvement on my neighborhood, and put some public accommodations where the shitty religious school is, or build over the open storm drain and turf grass that's too steep to use for recreational purposes and everybody would still drive to anything outside of a couple square miles or so.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    And need big asphalt roads that retain heat and make the surrounding area significantly warmer compared to either light rail, smaller roads needed for bikes and even regular train tracks

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    To be fair they don't necessarily need asphalt roads. That's just what used to be the most convenient and relatively cheaper kind of road. There are other options these days that are better both for the vehicles and for the environment - but even if those better options were used, your point still stands in general.

  • source
  • parent