74
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Dirt_Possum@hexbear.net 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A little meta and maybe a nitpick, but "food" doesn't need a content warning label. It's dead animals or their secretions (meat/dairy) only that need the content warning. Whether intended or not, it comes across as being rather snarky or disdainful about the rule here to warn about "food" when food is not the not the problem. It would be like if there were slurs or casual ableism in a screenshot image but the content warning for it was "[CW: Human Interaction]"

[-] Krem@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago

"CW: Food" instead of "CW: Meat, dairy" looks kinda like "CW: pronouns" instead of "CW: intentional misgendering" or something

this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2026
74 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14381 readers
624 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS