That's a fuckload of words that barely come close to answering the question of "what in this new system of yours protects against rape gangs"?

Maybe drop your edgy hate-fetish and answer the question instead of attacking other ideas? Because this is the closest you came and it's handwavey as fuck.

Anarchy is not the lack of government, it's horizontal governance. Hierarchy is not necessary for community policing or restorative justice.

Listing three Adjectice Noun keywords works just fine as for signaling to others who agree with your abstract goals that you can get a beer together, but does fuck all to convince anyone to join or respect your cause.

I care about boys and girls not getting gang-raped, and such rape-gangs being effectively punsihed so they stop being such and others are incentivized not to follow their lead. Extant states today attempt this through the state monopoly on proactice violence and the various political and legal systems which determine when such violence may be used.

You're suggesting eliminating "the state", meaning the thing that results from said political activity and through its various judicial systems does the aforementioned proactice violence. While I agree that this system is imperfect, I am not at all convincded that whatever you are suggesting would be even at least as just because you keep wasting your words on arguing how the current system is bad.

Just because the current system is bad doesn't mean some other system wouldn't be worse.