you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

He said exactly the same thing I said: laws like the California one that don't require age verification are fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (3 children)

    It’s about kid safety! Take off your tin hat! Right?

    … well https://lemmy.ml/post/46083470

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Once again, that post is about age verification, so it doesn't apply to the California law. If there are no documents or pictures stored for age verification, there is nothing to breach.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    Let the sharp edge of the wedge in and lose in the long run. This thread isn’t about California.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    It is about California. The comment you replied to was about California. My comments replying to you have been about California. That original comment you replied to and my own comments have said that California's law is reasonable. You keep saying it isn't, but you have yet to present any reason why.

  • source
  • parent