▲ 946 ▼ Federal Bill Would Bring OS-Level Age Verification to the Entire U.S. (linuxiac.com) submitted 5 months ago by throws_lemy@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world 332 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] ImitationLimitation@lemmy.ml 1 point 5 months ago (5 children) https://youtu.be/beZAkeJcv80 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] pfried@reddthat.com 1 point 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children) He said exactly the same thing I said: laws like the California one that don't require age verification are fine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ImitationLimitation@lemmy.ml 1 point 5 months ago (3 children) It’s about kid safety! Take off your tin hat! Right? … well https://lemmy.ml/post/46083470 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] pfried@reddthat.com 0 points 5 months ago (2 children) Once again, that post is about age verification, so it doesn't apply to the California law. If there are no documents or pictures stored for age verification, there is nothing to breach. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ImitationLimitation@lemmy.ml 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) Let the sharp edge of the wedge in and lose in the long run. This thread isn’t about California. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pfried@reddthat.com 1 point 5 months ago It is about California. The comment you replied to was about California. My comments replying to you have been about California. That original comment you replied to and my own comments have said that California's law is reasonable. You keep saying it isn't, but you have yet to present any reason why. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pfried@reddthat.com 1 point 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children) He said exactly the same thing I said: laws like the California one that don't require age verification are fine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ImitationLimitation@lemmy.ml 1 point 5 months ago (3 children) It’s about kid safety! Take off your tin hat! Right? … well https://lemmy.ml/post/46083470 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] pfried@reddthat.com 0 points 5 months ago (2 children) Once again, that post is about age verification, so it doesn't apply to the California law. If there are no documents or pictures stored for age verification, there is nothing to breach. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ImitationLimitation@lemmy.ml 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) Let the sharp edge of the wedge in and lose in the long run. This thread isn’t about California. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pfried@reddthat.com 1 point 5 months ago It is about California. The comment you replied to was about California. My comments replying to you have been about California. That original comment you replied to and my own comments have said that California's law is reasonable. You keep saying it isn't, but you have yet to present any reason why. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ImitationLimitation@lemmy.ml 1 point 5 months ago (3 children) It’s about kid safety! Take off your tin hat! Right? … well https://lemmy.ml/post/46083470 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] pfried@reddthat.com 0 points 5 months ago (2 children) Once again, that post is about age verification, so it doesn't apply to the California law. If there are no documents or pictures stored for age verification, there is nothing to breach. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ImitationLimitation@lemmy.ml 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) Let the sharp edge of the wedge in and lose in the long run. This thread isn’t about California. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pfried@reddthat.com 1 point 5 months ago It is about California. The comment you replied to was about California. My comments replying to you have been about California. That original comment you replied to and my own comments have said that California's law is reasonable. You keep saying it isn't, but you have yet to present any reason why. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pfried@reddthat.com 0 points 5 months ago (2 children) Once again, that post is about age verification, so it doesn't apply to the California law. If there are no documents or pictures stored for age verification, there is nothing to breach. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ImitationLimitation@lemmy.ml 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) Let the sharp edge of the wedge in and lose in the long run. This thread isn’t about California. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pfried@reddthat.com 1 point 5 months ago It is about California. The comment you replied to was about California. My comments replying to you have been about California. That original comment you replied to and my own comments have said that California's law is reasonable. You keep saying it isn't, but you have yet to present any reason why. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ImitationLimitation@lemmy.ml 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) Let the sharp edge of the wedge in and lose in the long run. This thread isn’t about California. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pfried@reddthat.com 1 point 5 months ago It is about California. The comment you replied to was about California. My comments replying to you have been about California. That original comment you replied to and my own comments have said that California's law is reasonable. You keep saying it isn't, but you have yet to present any reason why. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pfried@reddthat.com 1 point 5 months ago It is about California. The comment you replied to was about California. My comments replying to you have been about California. That original comment you replied to and my own comments have said that California's law is reasonable. You keep saying it isn't, but you have yet to present any reason why. permalink fedilink source parent