141
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 76 points 1 month ago

Really desperate for relevancy since her last zionist tantrum didn't get her the response she wanted.

Hasan would be a fool to have her on, it would just be her trying to bait him into something that lets her play the victim, then she'll try to frame it as him being transphobic and anti-Semitic because he wouldn't indulge her nonsense. Or he wouldn't critique her at all, worried about the previous outcome and look like even more a fool who isn't willing to defend his convictions in front of a bigoted POS.

[-] Ishmael@hexbear.net 49 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah there's no reason for him to have her on. She'd make a bunch of wishy-washy statements about how both sides are bad and then make a nine hour long video about the conversation titled "Antisemitism and Misogyny"

[-] PKMKII@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not to mention it’s not a good strategic move for Hasan. Her clout has waned in recent years, while his is ascending, and it’s not like she’s got some especially unique or useful insight or knowledge base. He wouldn’t gain anything from it.

this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
141 points (98.6% liked)

Slop.

857 readers
429 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS