It seems like it would be trivial for them to reduce quality control and have customers just "deal with" chips that aren't as stable. How come they aren't doing this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 5 months ago

Happens all the time... Back in the day if you had a chip with a failed math co-processor, you just sold it as a cheaper version without it. That kind of thing.

  • source