421
Court Rules in Pornhub’s Favor: Age-Verification Law Violates First Amendment (variety.com)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
41 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/2168303

Archived version: https://archive.ph/1rtQu
Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20230901022438/https://variety.com/2023/digital/news/pornhubs-texas-age-verification-law-violates-first-amendment-ruling-1235709902/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

Zero knowledge proof. Trusted issuer issues proof of birthdays. User submits proof of minimum age without disclosing additional information.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    That would require you to disclose proof of your real-life identity to some dubious company for the purpose of unlocking porn. Definitely not privacy-preserving.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    The company you disclose your age and online reference to doesn't need to know how their confirmation will be used. It could be an entity already knowledgeable (DVLA, IRS).

    But yes, if porn is the only use case then this method is self incriminating.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    But yes, if porn is the only use case then this method is self incriminating.

    That is precisely the problem. It will mostly or only be used for porn.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •