you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 5 months ago (1 child)

Because of nationalism and colonialism. They might use religious rhetoric where it suits them and there are religious people in government, I don't deny that, but over all it's a ethnic supremecist ideology and religion is only one identity marker, not the motivator.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    And all of this is rooted in religious overtones. You take the religious aspects out and I doubt this would be happening. The ethnic supremacy is rooted in religion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    Murican patriotic rhetoric is full of liberty and the founding fathers and the flag and stuff. Do you think, without one of these elements, there would be no nationalism?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments