β² 738 βΌ Faithful (thelemmy.club) submitted 5 months ago by Beep@lemmus.org to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world 269 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[β] nsrxn@mstdn.social -1 points 5 months ago (1 child) agnostic is a viable third option permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago* (1 child) There's no third options here. You can't simultaneously accept the claim that there's at least one deity and not accept the claim that there's at least one deity. If you're doing the former, that rules out the latter. If you're doing the latter, that rules out the former. This shit is Boolean bro permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] nsrxn@mstdn.social 0 points 5 months ago (1 child) you don't need to accept either claim. you can suspend judgement. try reading into epistemology permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) I'm glad we finally agree. Not accepting either claim means you're an agnostic atheist. Have a good day permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] nsrxn@mstdn.social -1 points 5 months ago your semantics are dull permalink fedilink source parent
[β] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago* (1 child) There's no third options here. You can't simultaneously accept the claim that there's at least one deity and not accept the claim that there's at least one deity. If you're doing the former, that rules out the latter. If you're doing the latter, that rules out the former. This shit is Boolean bro permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] nsrxn@mstdn.social 0 points 5 months ago (1 child) you don't need to accept either claim. you can suspend judgement. try reading into epistemology permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) I'm glad we finally agree. Not accepting either claim means you're an agnostic atheist. Have a good day permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] nsrxn@mstdn.social -1 points 5 months ago your semantics are dull permalink fedilink source parent
[β] nsrxn@mstdn.social 0 points 5 months ago (1 child) you don't need to accept either claim. you can suspend judgement. try reading into epistemology permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) I'm glad we finally agree. Not accepting either claim means you're an agnostic atheist. Have a good day permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] nsrxn@mstdn.social -1 points 5 months ago your semantics are dull permalink fedilink source parent
[β] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) I'm glad we finally agree. Not accepting either claim means you're an agnostic atheist. Have a good day permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] nsrxn@mstdn.social -1 points 5 months ago your semantics are dull permalink fedilink source parent
[β] nsrxn@mstdn.social -1 points 5 months ago your semantics are dull permalink fedilink source parent