this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
60 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32079 readers
934 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In order to prevent porn and fraud sites from being accessed, they're uploading exhaustive lists of those sites to everyone's computer? Somehow this seems like it won't work out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As far as I know, there are ways to do that without revealing the websites blocked (for example bloom filter, with a note that it can have false positives, or just the hashes of the domains)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

False positives seem bad when you're trying to justify your censorship as necessary and not arbitrary

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the catch is more that it will be hard to keep an exhaustive list.

I'd like to add the whole government misuse angle too. People roll their eyes sometimes but It Could Happen Here. History has not ended, that's just a comforting delusion at this point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

'roll their eyes'. Even if they (the government) didn't try to misuse it, lots of sites will end on it accidently or by deciding individuals that have an agenda. And it suspect it would be a nightmare to get your site off it.