you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child)

The issue is that power and money corrupt.

The man in power won't be giving it up voluntarily. So you join the revolution, and follow a charismatic leader into a civil war. You win and in the end you find out, you have been backing Napoleon and now he's the one chopping off heads.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Napoleon wasnt all that bad of a choice to back though. His decisions did a lot of lasting good.

    Having backed Robespierre though must have made a lot of people feel really silly about themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago*

    Napoléon certainly got a lot more people killed than Robespierre.

    He was a military genius but the battle he fought still had a lot of blood from French and other. Millions of dead for nothing but some little man glory.

    Only 30 000 died because of the terror

  • source
  • parent