There was no discussion to begin with, that would requires you to understand enough to respond to the text being presented, there had been no evidence of that so far.

I can and have been engaging just fine, you seem to be the one having trouble with this particular interaction.

As I stated initially ( it's still there, feel free to review ) the terms themselves aren't the red flag, it's the approach to using them.

I did engage you in earnest, with my contextual perspective and then with questions somewhat related to the subject.

You went with a slight as a response, didn't read the rest of it and then proceeded to guess incorrectly multiple times about information easily available.

If you don't want to read, that's fine, suggesting reading materials for a context you don't understand however, makes you seem incompetent.

I demanded nothing, which again you would know if you had read or understood the response.

I don't think further communication will be to anyone's benefit, you've shown no indication of being able to follow along with basic conversation.

Not a single response has been relevant to the text to which it was replying.

I'd be genuinely surprised if you could actually compile an OS. Which means your opinion on related topics is suspect as far as I am concerned.