219
Artix isn't going to comply with age-gating. (forum.artixlinux.org)
submitted 7 months ago* by to c/linux@lemmy.ml
74 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Per the very first reply on their thread discussing it in their forums, which I linked directly to for the post title:

We'll NEVER require any verification or identification from the user.

However, what's gonna happen should the attempts to age-gate the XDG portal screw over alt-init distros like Artix too? My guess is maybe they start blocking regions which force age gating like Arch Linux 32 is doing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 7 months ago (4 children)

they both seem way too eager for my taste to go along with this nonsense

Based on what? They have specifically addressed the issue and it does not read like they're eager to have this forced on them by state laws.

https://blog.system76.com/post/system76-on-age-verification

We are accustomed to adding operating system features to comply with laws. Accessibility features for ADA, and power efficiency settings for Energy Star regulations are two examples. We are a part of this world and we believe in the rule of law. We still hope these laws will be recognized for the folly they are and removed from the books or found unconstitutional.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    That's system76, not systemd. System76 is atleast trying to see what they can do (or rather can not do) and are in talks with legislators to see what this actually means for them (if it ends up meaning anything at all, apparently open sourse systems could be exempt from it). I've also seen discussions on nixos discourse to see what the best course of action is, and they are also not planning on just folding, but instead looking to bypass the issue. Meanwhile systemd already has the commits ready it seems, no questions asked.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    That’s system76, not systemd.

    Yeah oops, I'm just dumb.

    Meanwhile systemd already has the commits ready it seems, no questions asked.

    Because it's a trivial addition that was requested by a large user of systemd.

    I don't like these laws either, but they do exist. Go after the politicians who're making them. Don't go after the, volunteer, developers for not making a political stand on your behalf.

    It's an optional field, unverified, unenforced and in the worst case, this is open source software so you can simply revert that PR and build it yourself without the extra field or if you feel super strongly about it you can fork the project.

    Heaping ire on the development team is the part that I'm taking issue with.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    When did i go after the developers? I never attacked them personally whatsoever, i just voiced a concern. At the end of the day they can do what they want with the project. I don't even use systemd nor xdg-desktop-portal myself, so this doesn't affect me (atleast not yet).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •