229
Federal Surveillance Tech Becomes Mandatory in New Cars by 2027 (www.yahoo.com)
submitted 5 months ago by to c/privacy@programming.dev
65 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 3 points 5 months ago (1 child)

I just point them to this great movie that programmed the masses for this.
Ignorance is their choice.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I wouldn't even call them ignorant, because that implies innocence or naïvety; this is actively hostile

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    Oh, they get hostile against you telling them this is part of their fascist plans?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago* (1 child)

    Yeah, but I also meant that actively trying to shut down people who point out this is surveillance is hostile to the message that it is fascism (it's not just a "idk").

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    That's your instance as well. Tis why I am ani.social, and anarchist instances.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    Is that similar to the moderation on .ml? I was recently banned from memes.ml because I was unapologetically criticizing china and they didn't seem to like it.

    In other words, do anarchist instances suffer from the same moderation prejudices of communist-centric ones?

    If they do, there wouldn't be much of a difference.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    Marxist Lennists instances differ from anarchist ones in one key aspect: freedom of association. The fact they banned you for anti Xi rhetorics instead of engage your appropriate criticism in earnest is why ML instance do not praxis intersection. Only if it becomes convenient to ally, they’ll support you until you're no longer necessary:
    Stalin disassociation in history

    do anarchist instances suffer from the same moderation prejudices of communist-centric ones?

    In short no, because we comprehend folks come from many different backgrounds and biases, and as anarchists, we try to intersect to break those biases down. We outreach instead of silence.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    Appreciate the response.

    It's funny, I just saw a meme where anarchists were portrayed as being the ones to ditch communists after common goals have been achieved.

    What community/instance would you recommend?

    Do you mind getting into a discussion around what anarchism is/etc more?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    Show me that meme! It's historically always the inverse!

    community/instance would you recommend?

    So far, the one I am on, *.dbzer0.com, anarchist.nexus, quokk.au etc.. I can’t afford to make mine yet due to the dwindling Yen.

    Do you mind getting into a discussion around what anarchism is/etc more?

    Always! We co-read weekly new topics!

    I am currently banned on dbzero due to a huge misunderstanding, I am going to wait on my appeal to go through the week. So far Jorunn (she/her) @piefed.blahaj.zone has nayed my motion to apologize, and thus double-down on misinterpreting my satire for bigotry.

    But you can DM me for my personal views as well. My wife is a regular in the jabber chat.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •